Anzeige
Mehr »
Login
Freitag, 26.04.2024 Börsentäglich über 12.000 News von 686 internationalen Medien
Geheimtipp: Rasanter Aufstieg, Branchenrevolution und Jahresumsatz von 50 Mio. $
Anzeige

Indizes

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Aktien

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Xetra-Orderbuch

Fonds

Kurs

%

Devisen

Kurs

%

Rohstoffe

Kurs

%

Themen

Kurs

%

Erweiterte Suche
Marketwired
13 Leser
Artikel bewerten:
(0)

Ascot Resources Ltd.: Updated Resource Estimate at Premier Has Indicated Resources at Big Missouri and Martha Ellen Grading More Than a Gram per Ton Gold Equivalent

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 03/31/14 -- Ascot Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE: AOT) (the "Company") is pleased to announce that Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo. (Geosim Services Inc.), has completed an updated independent National Instrument 43-101 compliant mineral resource estimate for the Company's Premier-Dilworth Gold-Silver Project located near Stewart, British Columbia.

Highlights for the 2014 mineral resource estimate include:

--  New mineral resources estimates, covering the Big Missouri, Martha Ellen
    and Dilworth areas, within optimized pit shells, at a cut-off grade of
    0.3 g/t gold equivalent (AuEq) of 2.830 million ounces AuEq at a grade
    of 0.94 g/t AuEq in the indicated category and 1.804 million ounces AuEq
    at a grade of 0.71 g/t AuEq in the inferred category.
--  Indicated resource at Big Missouri of 2.007 million ounces AuEq at a
    grade of 1.01 g/t AuEq.
--  Indicated resource at Martha Ellen of 0.354 million ounces AuEq at a
    grade of 1.32 g/t AuEq.
--  Sensitivity to cut-off grades indicates the system remains robust with
    higher grade cut-offs.
--  Big Missouri and Martha Ellen deposits have a significant increase in
    gold grades compared to the Feb.12, 2013 resource while the new Dilworth
    deposit adds substantial silver to the resource. All reported with
    higher cut-off grades.

The new and updated mineral resource estimates are based on data from 647 core holes (141,166 m) completed by Ascot since 2007 from three target areas: the Big Missouri deposit, Martha Ellen deposit and the Dilworth deposit. All three target areas remain open for expansion as shallow dipping sheets within a six square kilometer area and are believed to be portions of one large continuous system. This latest resource represents approximately 20% of the total target area.

These targets have the advantage of having favorable moderate topography and developed infrastructure from previous mine operations and a new hydroelectric project at Long Lake on the property.

The new and updated mineral resource estimates are summarized in the following table:

Mineral Resources reported at a 0.3 g/t AuEq cut off.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Average Grades     Contained oz (000's)
                          Tonnes  --------------------  --------------------
Class       Deposit        000's  Au g/t  Ag g/t  AuEq     Au      Ag   AuEQ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Big Missouri  61,859    0.91     5.8  1.01  1,810  11,535  2,007
            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            Martha Ellen   8,345    1.15     9.9  1.32    309   2,656    354
Indicated   ----------------------------------------------------------------
            Dilworth      23,298    0.48     8.8  0.63    357   6,592    469
            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            Total         93,502    0.82     6.9  0.94  2,475  20,783  2,830
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Big Missouri  34,665    0.74     8.0  0.88    825   8,916    976
            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            Martha Ellen   3,236    0.70    11.6  0.90     73   1,207     93
Inferred    ----------------------------------------------------------------
            Dilworth      41,377    0.45     6.1  0.55    596   8,115    734
            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            Total         79,278    0.59     7.2  0.71  1,494  18,238  1,804
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1-Mineral Resources have an effective Date March 31, 2014; Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo., is the Qualified Person responsible for the Mineral Resource estimates.

2-Mineral Resources are reported inside optimized pit shells using a gold equivalent grade of 0.3 g/t.

3-Tonnages are rounded to the nearest thousand tonnes; grades are rounded to two decimal places for Au and two for Ag. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content.

The mineral resource estimate is based on a three geologic block models. A combination of lithologic, structural and grade domain models were used to constrain grade estimation. Block dimensions were 10 by 10 by 10 metres. Density values assigned to the principal lithologies are based on 2,044 specific gravity measurements of pulp samples.

Gold and silver grade estimation was carried out by the inverse distance weighting method to the third power (ID3) using 2 metre downhole drill hole composites. Only data from Ascot from Ascot programs was used in grade estimation. Data from historical drilling programs (pre-2007) was used to assist in modeling of lithologic and grade domains.

Classified blocks have been constrained by a Lerch-Grossman optimized pit shell using a gold price of $1,400 per ounce and a silver price of $24 per ounce. Cost Assumptions for pit optimization included processing + G & A at $10.00/t and mining at $2.00/t. Assumed metal recovery factors were 92% for gold 65% for silver. Pit slope was set at 45 degrees.

The following tables show the sensitivity of the Premier-Dilworth Mineral Resource to a range of cut-off grades with the Base Case highlighted. These cases represent application of cut-off grades to classified blocks in the resource model and do not represent different pit optimizations.

Sensitivity to Cut-off
Combined Indicated
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
COG g/t       Tonnes                       AuEQ    0z Au     0z Ag   0z AuEQ
AuEq           000's   Au g/t   Ag g/t      g/t    000's     000's     000's
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25          96,180     0.80      6.8     0.92    2,484    21,150     2,845
0.30          93,502     0.82      6.9     0.94    2,475    20,783     2,830
0.35          87,809     0.86      7.1     0.98    2,425    20,115     2,767
0.40          79,938     0.92      7.5     1.04    2,352    19,174     2,678
0.45          71,923     0.97      7.8     1.11    2,252    17,974     2,557
0.50          64,030     1.05      8.2     1.19    2,157    16,795     2,442
1.00          24,184     1.81     11.1     2.00    1,410     8,657     1,558
2.00           6,682     3.46     14.4     3.70      743     3,098       796
3.00           3,156     4.90     14.8     5.15      497     1,504       523
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combined Inferred
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
COG g/t       Tonnes                       AuEQ    0z Au     0z Ag   0z AuEQ
AuEq           000's   Au g/t   Ag g/t      g/t    000's     000's     000's
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25          81,493     0.58      7.0     0.70    1,508    18,449     1,822
0.30          79,278     0.59      7.2     0.71    1,494    18,238     1,804
0.35          73,056     0.61      7.5     0.74    1,443    17,517     1,742
0.40          62,597     0.67      8.1     0.80    1,341    16,333     1,619
0.45          52,181     0.72      8.9     0.88    1,216    14,952     1,470
0.50          42,440     0.80      9.9     0.97    1,094    13,453     1,323
1.00          11,690     1.50     14.6     1.75      563     5,469       656
2.00           2,362     3.12     17.8     3.42      237     1,352       260
3.00             873     4.96     13.7     5.19      139       383       146
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ascot is planning an aggressive 2014 drill program over all three target areas (Big Missouri, Martha Ellen and Dilworth). In addition Ascot now has a working database for the Premier mine area, which contains 4,453 historic drill holes. This database will allow Ascot to outline and test high grade underground targets in the old mine area.

Qualified Persons

The Independent Qualified Persons as defined by NI 43-101 for the purpose of this news release are Mr. Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo., of Geosim Services Inc. The contents of this press release have been reviewed and approved by Mr. Simpson. Graeme Evans, P.Geo., is the Company Qualified Person responsible for the supervision of the drilling programs. Mr. Evans has also reviewed and approved the contents of this news release.

An updated mineral resource report will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.

On Behalf of the Board of Directors

ASCOT RESOURCES LTD.

John A. Toffan, President and Director

The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

All statements, trend analysis and other information contained in this press release relative to markets about anticipated future events or results constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as "seek", "anticipate", "believe", "plan", "estimate", "expect" and "intend" and statements that an event or result "may", "will", "should", "could" or "might" occur or be achieved and other similar expressions. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein, including, without limitation; the completion of the Offering on the terms set forth herein, the anticipated closing date of the Offering and the use of proceeds from the Offering are forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results of operations to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations include fluctuations in commodity prices and currency exchange rates; uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill results and the geology, continuity and grade of mineral deposits; the need for cooperation of government agencies and native groups in the exploration and development of properties and the issuance of required permits; the need to obtain additional financing to develop properties and uncertainty as to the availability and terms of future financing; the possibility of delay in exploration or development programs and uncertainty of meeting anticipated program milestones; and uncertainty as to timely availability of permits and other governmental approvals. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and opinions of management at the date the statements are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required by applicable securities laws. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Contacts:
Ascot Resources Ltd.
(604) 379-1170
www.ascotresources.ca

Großer Insider-Report 2024 von Dr. Dennis Riedl
Wenn Insider handeln, sollten Sie aufmerksam werden. In diesem kostenlosen Report erfahren Sie, welche Aktien Sie im Moment im Blick behalten und von welchen Sie lieber die Finger lassen sollten.
Hier klicken
© 2014 Marketwired
Werbehinweise: Die Billigung des Basisprospekts durch die BaFin ist nicht als ihre Befürwortung der angebotenen Wertpapiere zu verstehen. Wir empfehlen Interessenten und potenziellen Anlegern den Basisprospekt und die Endgültigen Bedingungen zu lesen, bevor sie eine Anlageentscheidung treffen, um sich möglichst umfassend zu informieren, insbesondere über die potenziellen Risiken und Chancen des Wertpapiers. Sie sind im Begriff, ein Produkt zu erwerben, das nicht einfach ist und schwer zu verstehen sein kann.