LONDON, July 31, 2014 /PRNewswire/ --
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP LIMITED
PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDED30 JUNE 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary and Outlook....................................................... 1
Key Metrics
Return on Equity ................................................................ 4
Earnings per Share .............................................................. 5
NAV per Share ................................................................... 7
Distributions ................................................................... 8
Cash Flows and Uses of Cash
Cash Flows and Uses of Cash..................................................... 10
TFG's Business Segments
TFG Structure Overview ........................................................... 12
Investment Portfolio
Investment Portfolio Overview .................................................. 13
Portfolio Composition and Outlook .............................................. 13
Corporate Loans ................................................................ 15
U.S. CLO 1.0 ................................................................... 15
U.S. CLO 2.0 ................................................................... 16
European CLOs .................................................................. 16
Direct Loans ................................................................... 17
Polygon Equity Funds ........................................................... 17
Polygon Credit, Convertible & Distressed Funds ................................. 17
Other Equity, Credit, Convertible & Distressed ................................. 17
Real Estate..................................................................... 17
Hedging Activity and Other Matters ............................................. 17
TFG Asset Management
Update on Key Metrics .......................................................... 18
Asset Management Businesses..................................................... 19
LCM............................................................................. 20
GreenOak Joint Venture ......................................................... 21
Polygon ........................................................................ 22
H1 2014 Financial Review
Financial Highlights ........................................................... 26
Statement of Operations ........................................................ 27
Statement of Operations by Business Segment .................................... 28
Balance Sheet .................................................................. 29
Statement of Cash Flows ........................................................ 30
Net Economic Income to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation ................................ 31
Appendices
Appendix I: Certain Regulatory Information ..................................... 33
Appendix II: Fair Value Determination of TFG's CLO Equity Investments .......... 34
Appendix III: Additional CLO Portfolio Statistics .............................. 37
Appendix IV: Share Reconciliation and Shareholdings ............................ 41
Board of Directors ............................................................. 42
Shareholder Information......................................................... 42
End notes........................................................................ 43
Tetragon Financial Group Limited Unaudited Financial Statements for the Period Ended 30 June2014
Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited Unaudited Financial Statements forthePeriodEnded 30 June 2014
Tetragon Financial Group Limited ("TFG" or the "company") is a Guernsey closed-ended investment company traded on Euronext Amsterdam N.V. under the ticker symbol "TFG."(1) In this report we provide an update on TFG's results of operations for the period ending 30 June 2014.
EXECUTIVESUMMARY ANDOUTLOOKOVERVIEW
TFG achieved a positive operating and financial performance in the first half of 2014. Net economic income was $86.0 million ($0.90 cents of earnings per share), giving an annualised return on equity ("RoE") of 9.5% (just below the company's over-the-cycle target of 10-15% per annum).(2) Performance was positive in both the company's business segments, namely the investment portfolio and TFG Asset Management. Before tax, the investment portfolio generated $73.6 million of net economic income before tax ($0.77 of earnings per share) and the asset management businesses generated $16.3 million of net economic income before tax ($0.17 of earnings per share).
The Q2 2014 dividend was declared at 15.5 cents per share, giving a rolling 12-month dividend increase of 13.3%.
Returns were particularly strong in Q2 2014 in our U.S. CLO 1.0 transactions(3), where steady underlying performance was supplemented by gains on sales and discount rate reductions, which was a welcome pick up from a somewhat below-average first quarter. The reverse was true in equities, where TFG gave up some of the gains achieved in Q1 2014. TFG Asset Management performed well, with steady AUM growth in all businesses and good fund level performance, which hopefully bodes well for future management and performance fees.
GOALS
Looking at the company's goals:
1. To deliver 10-15% RoEper annumto shareholders.(4)
The annualised RoE in the first half of 2014 was 9.5%.
2. To manage more of TFG's assets onthe TFG Asset Management platform in order to reducethe proportion of TFG's capital that paysaway feesto third-party managers.
The amount of TFG's capital that paid fees to external managers at the end of Q2 2014 was 40.1%, down from 53.4% at the end of 2013.(5)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & OUTLOOK (continued)
3. To grow client AUM andfee income inTFGAsset Management.
Assets under management ("AUM") at 30 June 2014 stood at $10.5 billion, up from $9.2 billion at 2013 year-end.(6)
TFG Asset Management's fee income (including potential hedge fund performance fees that don't crystallise until year end) was $37.7 million, up 17.1% on the same period last year.(7)
4. To add further asset management businessesto the TFG Asset Management platform.
No new businesses were added in H1 2014, but the Polygon(i) distressed business established in 2013 continues on plan, and several new businesses remain under active consideration.
OUTLOOK
Although the first half results are slightly below our over-the-cycle target, as we have said previously, this might be expected in the current low LIBOR environment. Thus, over the short term, we do not see any material changes as we enter the second half of the year. However, we remain cautiously optimistic for the longer term. The company's portfolio of investments is becoming more diversified and many of its investments are hedged to broad market moves and thus are hopefully less susceptible to the vagaries of market indices. Furthermore, all of TFG Asset Management's contributors - Polygon, LCM(ii), and the joint venture with GreenOak(iii)- are performing and growing strongly, and thus TFG's strategy of having an investment portfolio and owning asset management businesses in tandem is progressing well.
INVESTOR DAY
TFG will host its annual investor day in London on 10 September 2014. The event will also be webcast live. The presentations are expected to review TFG's business model, its investment portfolio and its asset management businesses. Further details regarding registration and the agenda will be published closer to the date of the event.
(i) Polygon Global Partners LP and Polygon Global Partners LLP and certain of their affiliates, hereinafter referred to in this report as "Polygon."
(ii) LCM Asset Management LLC, hereinafter referred to in this report as "LCM."
(iii) GreenOak Real Estate, LP, hereinafter referred to in this report as "GreenOak."
KEY METRICS
TFG continues to focus on three key metrics when assessing how value is being created for, and delivered to, TFG shareholders: Earnings, Net Asset Value ("NAV") per share and Dividends.
EARNINGS - RETURN ONEQUITY ("RoE")
-Year to date RoE(8) of 4.8% (9.5% annualised) brings performance slightly below TFG's over-the- cycle target of 10-15% per annum.(9)
-TFG generated Net Economic Income(10) of $86.0 million in the first half of 2014, a fall of 13.6% versus the same period in 2013.
-H1 2014's earnings were particularly affected by six factors:
-Significant realised gains, mainly as a result of the sale of eight CLO positions during Q2 2014 at values at or above where TFG was carrying them.
-Unrealised gains on CLO investments as the discount rates used for U.S. CLO 1.0 and European deals were reduced in response to observable data.
-A continuing reduction in interest income as the CLO portfolio continued to amortise or was sold.
-Unrealised losses primarily on equity swap positions held on TFG's balance sheet as strong Q1 2014 performance was given back in Q2 2014.
-Continued AUM growth in TFG Asset Management which led to healthy increases in both management fees and unrealised performance fees. TFG Asset Management contributed approximately $17.8 million of EBITDA equivalent (see Figure 11) in the first half of 2014, an increase of 11.9% over the same period in 2013. In addition, an unrealised write up of TFG's 23% stake in the GreenOak business contributed to TFG Asset Management's below the EBITDA line profits.
-Realised and unrealised gains generated by TFG's investment in GreenOak-managed real estate assets.
Figure 1
Annual Return on Equity
RoE
2007 11.4%
2008 -3.7%
2009 -27.6%
2010 47.7%
2011 36.1%
2012 20.8%
2013 15.3%
2014 Annualised 9.5%
Average 14.0%
EARNINGS PER SHARE
• TFG generated an Adjusted EPS(11) of $0.90 during H1 2014 (H1 2013: $1.02).
Figure 2
Adjusted EPS Comparison H1 2012 - H1 2014 (USD)
H1 2012 $1.15
H1 2013 $1.02
H1 2014 $0.90
EARNINGS PER SHARE (continued)
-The further recalibration of discount rates used in modelling the fair value of the U.S. CLO 1.0 and European CLO portfolios, largely in response to sustained reductions in observed risk premia, added approximately $0.27 of EPS out of the $1.00 year-to-date EPS attributable to CLOs, before hedges.
-European CLOs continued their recovery, albeit at a less dramatic rate than was seen in H1 2013.
-Investments in Polygon funds across all asset classes made strong contributions to EPS in H1 2014, although certain direct equity investments, in particular, experienced volatility in Q2 2014, generating unrealised losses which, if our investment theses plays out, we would expect to reverse in the future.
-Real estate contributed $0.11, due to investment performance on the underlying GreenOak funds and investments.
Each of these business dynamics is discussed in more detail later in the report.
Figure 3
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
TFG Earnings per Share Analysis (H1 2013-H1 2014)
H1 2014 H1 2013
Investment portfolio segment
U.S. CLO 1.0 $0.74 $0.74
U.S. CLO 2.0 $0.12 $0.11
European CLOs $0.14 $0.39
U.S. Direct Loans $0.01 $0.02
Hedges ($0.08) $0.05
Polygon Equity Funds $0.12 $0.01
Polygon Credit, Convertibles & Distressed Funds $0.11 $0.01
Other Equities, Credit, Convertibles, Distressed ($0.07) -
Real Estate $0.11 $0.02
FX and Options ($0.02) ($0.02)
Expenses ($0.41) ($0.39)
Net EPS investment portfolio $0.77 $0.94
Asset Management Segment - TFG AM $0.17 $0.11
Corporate Income taxes ($0.04) ($0.03)
Adjusted EPS $0.90 $1.02
Weighted Average Shares (millions)(i) 96.0 98.0
(i) The time-weighted average daily U.S. GAAP Shares outstanding during the applicable year.
NAV PER SHARE
Pro Forma Fully DilutedNAV per Share ended the quarter at $17.08.
-Total NAV increased to $1,808.5 million which equated to Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share(12) of $17.08, another historic high for TFG.
[Figure 4]
(i) Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per share based on TFG's financial statements as of the relevant quarter-end date; TFG's closing share price data as per Bloomberg as of the last trading day of each quarter. Please note that the Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share reported as of each quarter-end date excludes any shares held in treasury or in a subsidiary as of that date, but includes (1) shares held in escrow, which are expected to be released and incorporated into the U.S. GAAP NAV per Share over a five-year period, and (2) the number of shares corresponding to the applicable intrinsic value of the options issued to the Investment Manager at the time of the company's IPO.
DISTRIBUTIONS
Dividends per Share ("DPS"): TFG declared a Q2 2014 DPS of $0.155, up from$0.15 in Q12014. On a rolling 12-month basis, the dividendof $0.595 represents a 13.3% increase over the preceding four quarters.
- TFG continues to pursue a progressive dividend policy with a target payout ratio of 30-50% of normalised earnings, recognising the long-term target RoE of 10-15%.(13) The Q2 2014 DPS of $0.155 brings the cumulative DPS since TFG's IPO to $3.13.
- In the most recent quarterly dividend paid , approximately 6.9 % of shareholders elected to take shares rather than cash, pursuant to the company's optional stock dividend program. In addition, holders of escrow shares received in connection with the Polygon transaction also receive dividends on such shares in the form of TFG stock in lieu of cash dividends.
Figure 5
12-month Rolling DPS Comparison H1 2012 - H1 2014 (USD)
H1 2012 $0.425
H1 2013 $0.525
H1 2014 $0.595
CASH FLOWS AND USES OF CASH
TFG's cash flows from operations decreased by 28.1% in the first half of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013, to $131.8 million. Cash flows generated by the CLO portfolio continued to be the primary source of operating cash although at $193.3 million, they decreased by 18.7% compared to the same period in 2013. This reflected, among other things, the deleveraging of much of the U.S. CLO 1.0 portfolio as well as the sale of some deals, both of which are discussed further in the investment portfolio section.
TFG took advantage of a buoyant level of market interest in CLO equity during Q2 2014 to sell $153.1(14) million of CLO equity interests at or above their carrying value. Sales were focused mainly on U.S. CLO 1.0 deals, but also included a European deal. TFG also invested $63.6 million into the equity tranches of new CLO issues in the first half of 2014, a 39.8% increase on the equivalent prior period, as LCM closed two significant deals during the period.TFG's investments in other asset classes - specifically equities, credit and convertible bonds primarily via Polygon-branded in- house managed funds - remained broadly unchanged in Q2 2014. TFG received distributions from certain GreenOak-managed vehicles following the sale of certain real estate assets in Japan and the United States, but overall, made net investments into real estate vehicles of $23.4 million during the period.
Figure 6
Cumulative TFG Share Repurchases ($MM)
Inception-2012 $257.5
2013 $273.6
Q2 2014 $324.5
TFG's direct loan portfolio was reduced further in H1 2014, with the year to date net cash flows from net sales of loans totalling $11.1 million. TFG utilised $27.3 million to pay cash dividends net of stock dividends in the first half of the year compared with $24.1 million in the equivalent period in 2013. No further share buybacks were undertaken in Q2 2014 to add to the tender offer conducted in Q1 2014, which resulted in a cash outflow of $50.9 million, including applicable fees and expenses. At theendofQ2 2014, TFG'sinvestiblecashbalancewas$225.7 million, approximately 12.5% of net assets, a slight increase as a percentage compared with the balance at the end of 2013.
TFG'SBUSINESSSEGMENTS
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
&
TFG ASSET MANAGEMENT
TFG STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
TFG owns 1) an investment portfolio of $1.8 billion of financial assets and 2) TFG Asset Management, a global alternative asset management business with $10.5 billion of client assets under management. Investors may find the below chart useful to better understand the company's structure.
[Figure 7]
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
TFG's investment portfolio posted positive overall performance during the first half of 2014 (details in Figure 9). Corporate Loan investments (primarily accessed via CLO equity) had a good second quarter, picking up from a slow first quarter. Polygon-managed equity funds gave back a small amount in Q2 2014 after a very strong Q1, as did other equity trades on the balance sheet. Polygon-managed convertible and distressed funds had a strong Q2 following on from a good Q1. The real estate assets also had a strong first half to the year.
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND OUTLOOK
TFG's net assets totaled $1,808.5 million at the end of Q2 2014. The following chart shows the composition of TFG's net assets by asset class for Q2 2014 and Q4 2013.
[Figure 8]
The following table summarizes certain performance metrics for each asset class in TFG's investment portfolio.
Figure 9
Asset Type H1 2014 Net Assets (in $MM) Income(iv) H1 2014 (in $MM)
U.S. CLO 1.0(i) $535.9 $71.2
U.S. CLO 2.0(i) $252.3 $11.4
European CLOs $145.1 $13.2
U.S. Direct Loans $24.7 $0.6
Hedges(ii) $4.5 ($7.6)
Polygon Equity Funds $192.6 $11.5
Polygon Credit, Convertibles & Distressed Funds $120.2 $11.0
Other Equities, Credit, Convertibles & Distressed(iii) $84.4 ($6.9)
Real Estate $95.1 $10.2
(i)"U.S. CLO 1.0" refers to U.S. CLOs issued before or during 2008. "U.S. CLO 2.0" refers to U.S. CLOs issued after 2008.
(ii)"Hedges" refers to interest rate swaption hedges put in place in relation to certain interest rate risks relating to the CLO portfolio.
(iii) Assets characterised as "Other Equities, Credit, Convertibles, Distressed" consist of the fair value of, or capital committed to, investment assets held directly on the balance sheet.
(iv) "Income" refers to the total income generated by each category in the quarter including where applicable, realised and unrealised gains and losses as well interest income, dividends and certain associated direct expenses such as interest expense on swaps.
CORPORATE LOANS
TFG's exposure to the corporate loan asset class (whether held directly or indirectly via CLO equity investments) remained diversified, and at the end of Q2 2014 comprised 76.3% in U.S. broadly-syndicated senior secured loans, 8.5% in U.S. middle-market senior secured loans and 15.2% in European senior secured loans.(15)
TFG's CLO equity investments, which comprise the majority of its exposure to corporate loan assets, represented indirect exposure to approximately $12.6 billion par value of underlying collateral.(16)
When reporting on our corporate loan exposures, we find it useful to further segment such investments into the following classes:
- U.S. CLO 1.0;
- U.S. CLO 2.0;
- European CLOs; and
- U.S. Direct Loans.
U.S. CLO 1.0
As of the end of Q2 2014, TFG held 44 U.S. CLO 1.0 equity investments and one investment in the debt tranche of a U.S. CLO 1.0 transaction.(17) All U.S. CLO 1.0 holdings were passing their junior-most O/C tests as of the end of the second quarter.(18)
During Q2 2014, the company sold seven equity tranche investments in U.S. CLO 1.0 transactions. We believe that the sales prices achieved were attractive taking into account, among other factors, the deals' expected future returns, as well as collateral-related risks of increased concentration and market value volatility upon liquidation. TFG may look to sell additional U.S. CLO 1.0 positions in the future as we continue to evaluate the expected risk/reward profile of those investments and alternate uses of our capital.
Earnings were also enhanced by the reduction of discount rates applied to the future projected cash flows of TFG's U.S. CLO 1.0 and European CLOs (see Appendix II "Fair Value Determination of TFG's CLO Equity Investments" for additional details).
Aside from the aforementioned asset sales, the wind-down pace of TFG's U.S. CLO 1.0 portfolio accelerated during the quarter, reflecting both loan repayments and certain managers' asset sales taking advantage of strong loan market conditions. During Q2 2014, one of TFG's earliest U.S. CLO 1.0 investments was successfully liquidated with net portfolio proceeds distributed to equity holders. As of the writing of this report, a number of TFG's U.S. CLO 1.0 transactions are at various stages of their unwind processes. We expect this segment to continue to amortise over the following quarters both via structural de-leveraging and equity investor or manager-directed optional redemptions.
U.S. CLO 2.0
As of the end of Q2 2014, TFG held 13 equity investments in U.S. CLO 2.0 deals, up from 12 investments at the end of Q1 2014, as TFG took a majority equity investment in a new LCM- managed CLO. All of TFG's U.S. CLO 2.0 transactions were in compliance with their junior-most O/C tests as of the end of Q2 2014.(19)
Despite the fact that the CLO equity arbitrage environment remains challenging due to relatively tight corporate loan spreads and stagnant CLO liability funding costs, we continue to believe that CLO 2.0 equity investments in deals managed by LCM offer attractive risk-adjusted returns as fees generated by LCM on third-party capital managed within the CLOs increase TFG's blended return on invested capital.
As stated in our Q1 2014 quarterly report, TFG successfully refinanced all of the debt tranches of LCM X in April 2014. Since then, the company has begun work on additional refinancing opportunities, which may lead to lower debt financing costs of other CLO 2.0 investments and therefore potentially increase the returns of TFG's equity tranche investments.
EUROPEAN CLOs
As of the end of Q2 2014, TFG held equity investments in nine European CLOs, compared to 10 in the Q1 2014 due to the sale of one transaction during the quarter. Similar to the sales of our U.S. CLO 1.0 deals, we believe the sale of this European CLO investment was made at an attractive price relative to our expectations of future returns. TFG may look to sell additional European CLO investments in the future as the company continues to assess alternate uses of its capital.
As above, earnings were also enhanced by the reduction of discount rates applied to the future projected cash flows of TFG's European CLOs (see Appendix II "Fair Value Determination of TFG's CLO Equity Investments" for additional details).
As of the end of Q2 2014, all of TFG's European CLO investments were passing their junior-most O/C tests.(20)
The following graph shows the evolution of TFG's CLO equity investment IRRs over the past three years.
[Figure 10]
DIRECT LOANS
TFG's direct loan portfolio performed well during Q2 2014, although its size was reduced to $24.7 million as a number of underlying loans were repaid, refinanced, or sold. The credit quality of this portfolio remained stable during the quarter and there continued to be no defaults. In the short term, the company does not expect to allocate additional capital to this strategy due to the existence of what we believe are more attractive alternative uses of company funds.
POLYGON EQUITY FUNDS
As of the end of Q2 2014, TFG had $192.6 million invested in Polygon-managed equity hedge fund products. Performance in all of these strategies was positive in H1 2014. Further details on performance can be found in the TFG Asset Management section of this report and in Figure 15.
POLYGON CREDIT, CONVERTIBLE & DISTRESSED FUNDS
All investments delivered positive returns for the quarter. Of note was the performance of the Polygon convertible strategy, which benefited from its more idiosyncratic return profile. During H1 2014, the strategy returned 12.6% net in its flagship A share class.(21) TFG invests in Polygon funds on preferential fee terms.
OTHEREQUITY, CREDIT, CONVERTIBLE AND DISTRESSED
TFG also invests directly in equities, convertible bonds and credit instruments. Some of these opportunities have arisen in part from TFG's ownership of Polygon and resulting access to new opportunities. TFG may invest in opportunities directly from its balance sheet rather than through, for example, investments in other funds or collective investment schemes, when it sees an opportunity that fits its investment criteria, particularly where our structuring ability and the company's long duration capital may give it a potential investment advantage. In some cases, TFG may also have exposure to the investment indirectly through fund investments. TFG experienced losses in Q2 2014 after a profitable Q1 2014 in this segment of its portfolio.
REAL ESTATE
During H1 2014, TFG registered $10.2 million of net income from GreenOak-managed real estate funds and vehicles. Although TFG made additional investments in the quarter into certain funds (with the bulk of new investments occurring in Japan-focused funds), TFG saw a significant amount of capital returned across all of the geographies (the United States, Europe, and Japan), reflecting the profitable sales of certain underlying assets.
HEDGINGACTIVITY AND OTHER MATTERS
TFG had no direct credit hedges in place at the end of Q2 2014, but employed certain foreign exchange rate and "tail risk" interest rate hedges to seek to mitigate its exposure to Euro-USD foreign exchange risk and a potential significant increase in inflation and/or nominal interest rates in the United States, respectively. These hedges lost money during H1 2014. TFG reviews the hedging strategy on an ongoing basis as the company seeks to address identified risks to the extent practicable and in a cost-effective manner.
TFG ASSET MANAGEMENT
OVERVIEW
TFG Asset Management comprises the fee income-generating areas of TFG's portfolio: management and performance fees from related and external asset managers.(22)
The three related asset management businesses, LCM, Polygon and the GreenOak joint venture, continued to perform well through the end of June 2014.
UPDATE ON KEY METRICS
-Performance of the underlying strategies: performance of the various strategies managed by TFG Asset Management's business segments remained strong in the first half of 2014.
-Gross revenues: composed primarily of management and performance fees from clients, totalled $33.0 million in H1 2014. If one includes the unrealised performance fees within the Polygon hedge funds (which may only crystallise at year end) then total fee income is $37.7 million versus $32.2 million for the same period last year.(23) As with 2013, the Q2 2014 fee income line was boosted by certain performance and management fees which are periodic in nature. From a quality of earnings perspective, we are pleased that the recurring management fees have grown strongly as a percentage of the total fee income.
-"EBITDA equivalent" (as described below): totalled $17.8 million in H1 2014, versus $15.9 million in H1 2013.
Figure 11
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
TFG Asset Management Statement of Operations H1 2014 vs. H1 2013
H1 2014 H1 2013
$MM $MM
Fee income(i) 33.0 30.7
Unrealised Polygon performance fees(ii) 4.7 1.5
Interest income 0.1 0.1
Total income 37.8 32.3
Operating, employee and administrative expenses(i) (20.0) (16.4)
Net income - "EBITDA equivalent" 17.8 15.9
Unrealised gain on asset management stake(iii) 5.7 -
Performance fee allocation to TFM (3.8) (2.0)
Amortisation expense on management contracts (3.4) (3.4)
Net economic income before taxes 16.3 10.5
(i) Nets off cost of recovery on "Other fee income" against this cost contained in "Operating, employee, and administrative expenses." Operating costs also removes amortisation from the U.S. GAAP segmental report. Fee income includes amounts earned through third-party fee sharing arrangements. It also includes any fees earned through fees paid on investments made by TFG in Polygon hedge funds or other investment vehicles. TFG is able to invest at a preferred level of fees.
(ii) Unrealised Polygon performance fees represent the fees calculated by the applicable administrator of the relevant Polygon funds, in accordance with the applicable fund constitutional documents, when determining NAV at quarter end, less certain assumed costs. Similar amounts, if any, from LCM and GreenOak are excluded from this line item. Such fees would typically not be realised or recognised under U.S. GAAP until calendar year end, and are therefore subject to change based on fund performance during the remainder of the year. There are can be no assurance that the company will realise all or any portion of such amounts. Through 30 June 2014, this amount equalled $4.7 million before (1) an assumed imputed tax charge and (2) estimated TFM performance fees reduced the net contribution to $2.5 million as shown in Figure 11 and further represented in Figures 18 and 19 of this report. It also includes any unrealised performance fees to potentially be paid on investments made by TFG in Polygon hedge funds or other investment vehicles. TFG is able to invest at a preferred level of fees.
(iii) Unrealised gain generated by a recalibration of the fair value of the 23% stake held in GreenOak. For accounting purposes TFG treats this stake as an investment carried at fair value rather than consolidating the underlying net assets and net income of this business.
ASSET MANAGEMENT BUSINESSES
AUM for LCM, Polygon and the GreenOak joint venture are shown below at 30 June 2014.
Figure 12
Summary of TFG Asset Management AUM ($BN)
Business 30 June 2014 31 March 2014
LCM $5.1 $4.9
GreenOak(i) $3.9 $4.1
Polygon(ii) $1.5 $1.4
Total $10.5 $10.4
(i) Includes funds and advisory assets managed by GreenOak Real Estate, LP, a separately registered investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. TFG owns a 23% interest in GreenOak.
(ii) AUM for Polygon Recovery Fund LP, Polygon Convertible Opportunity Master Fund, Polygon European Equity Opportunity Master Fund and associated managed account, Polygon Mining Opportunity Master Fund, Polygon Global Equities Master Fund, and Polygon Distressed Opportunities Master Fund, as calculated by the applicable fund administrator. Includes, where relevant, investments by Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited.
On the following pages are some brief updates on each of TFG Asset Management's businesses.
LCM
LCM is a specialist in below-investment grade U.S. broadly-syndicated leveraged loans that was established in 2001. Farboud Tavangar is the senior portfolio manager.
LCM continued to perform well in Q2 2014, with all of LCM's Cash Flow CLOs(24) that were still within their reinvestment periods continuing to pay senior and subordinated management fees.
At 30 June 2014, LCM's total CLO loan assets under management stood at approximately $5.1 billion. During H1 2014, the following activity occurred: LCM XV, a $624.0 million CLO, closed on 25 February 2014; LCM XVI, a $725.6 million CLO priced on 13 May 2014, and was the largest deal issued by LCM to date. LCM III was redeemed during H1 2014 and has no assets or notes outstanding. LCM managed 12 CLOs at 30 June 2014.
Figure 13
LCM Assets Under Management History ($BN)
Q3 2011 $3.4
Q4 2011 $3.4
Q1 2012 $3.7
Q2 2012 $4.1
Q3 2012 $3.9
Q4 2012 $4.3
Q1 2013 $4.5
Q2 2013 $4.3
Q3 2013 $4.3
Q4 2013 $4.2
Q1 2014 $4.8
Q2 2014 $5.1
GREENOAK JOINT VENTURE
GreenOak is a real estate-focused principal investing and advisory firm established in 2010. The Principals and Founders are John Carrafiell, Sonny Kalsi and Fred Schmidt.
During H1 2014, GreenOak continued to execute on its strategy with respect to its funds and its advisory assignments on behalf of select strategic clients with mandates in Europe, Japan and the United States. In particular, its second U.S. Fund is currently raising capital ahead of its target amount and potentially may be completed near the end of this summer.
At 30 June 2014, assets under management totalled approximately $3.9 billion.
Figure 14
GreenOak Assets Under Management History ($BN)
Q4 2011 $0.6
Q1 2012 $1.7
Q2 2012 $1.7
Q3 2012 $1.9
Q4 2012 $2.3
Q1 2013 $3.0
Q2 2013 $3.2
Q3 2013 $3.6
Q4 2013 $3.6
Q1 2014 $4.1
Q2 2014 $3.9
POLYGON
Total AUM for the Polygon funds was approximately $1.5 billion at 30 June 2014. The strategies all had positive returns in H1 2014 and two of the strategies now have a five-year track record since inception. AUM in the open hedge fund strategies rose to approximately $1.1 billion, an increase of 27.9% compared to the AUM in these vehicles at 31 December 2013.
Figure 15
Summary of Polygon Funds Assets Under Management ($MM)
2014 Annualised Net
Fund 30 June 2014 Net Performance LTD Performance
European Event-Driven Equity(i) $542.3 6.8% 14.8%
Convertibles(ii) $381.9 12.6% 21.2%
Mining Equities(iii) $69.7 4.3% 4.1%
Distressed Opportunities(iv) $79.0 7.7% 14.6%
Other Equity(v) $21.1 11.7% 18.0%
Total AUM - Open Funds $1,094.0
Private Equity Vehicle(vi) $428.9 0.1% 5.6%
Total AUM $1,522.9
(i) The fund began trading 8 July 2009 with Class B shares which carry no incentive fee. Class A shares commenced trading on 1 December 2009. Returns from inception through November 2009 for Class A shares have been pro forma adjusted to match the fund's Class A share terms as set forth in the Offering Memorandum (1.5% management fee, 20% incentive fee and other items, in each case, as set forth in the offering Memorandum). From December 2009 to February 2011, the table reflects actual Class A share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. From March 2011, forward, the table reflects actual Class A1 share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. Class A1 share performance is equivalent to Class A share performance for prior periods. AUM figure and net performance is for the Polygon European Equity Opportunity Master Fund and associated managed account as calculated by the applicable fund administrators.
(ii) The fund began trading with Class B shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 20 May 2009. Class A shares of the fund were first issued on 1 April 2010 and returns from inception through March 2010 have been pro forma adjusted to match the fund's Class A share terms as set forth in the Offering Memorandum (1.5% management fee, 20% incentive fee over a hurdle and other items, in each case, as set forth in the Offering Memorandum). AUM figure and net performance is for the Polygon Convertible Opportunity Master F und as calculated by the applicable fund administrator.
(iii) The fund began trading with Class B1 shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 1 June 2012. Returns through October 2013 have been pro forma adjusted to account for a 2.0% management fee, a 20% incentive fee, and non trading expenses capped at 1%, in each case, as set forth in the Offering Memorandum. Class A1 shares of the Fund were first issued on 1 November 2013. From November 2013, forward, performance reflects actual Class A1 share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. AUM figure and net performance is for the Polygon Mining Opportunity Master Fund as calculated by the applicable fund administrator.
(iv) The fund's inception was on 2 September 2013. Returns shown are for Class A shares reflecting the terms set forth in the offering documents (2.0% management fee, 20% incentive fee and other items, in each case, as set forth in the offering documents). AUM figure and net performance is for the Polygon Distressed Opportunities Master Fund as calculated by the applicable fund administrator.
(v) The fund began trading with Class B/B1 shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 12 September 2011. Returns shown from inception through August 2013 have been pro forma adjusted to account for a 2.0% management fee and a 20% incentive fee, in each case, as to be set forth in further definitive documents. The fund began trading Class A shares, which are not new issue eligible, on 23 September 2011. Class A1 shares of the Fund, which are new issue eligible, were first issued on 1 November 2013, and returns from inception through October 2013 have been pro forma adjusted to match the Fund's Class A1 performance. AUM figure and net performance is as calculated by the applicable fund administrator.
(vi) The Private Equity Vehicle noted above is the Polygon Recovery Fund L.P. ("PRF"). The manager of the PRF is a subsidiary of TFG having been acquired in the Polygon transaction. The management fees earned in respect of PRF are included in the TFG Asset Management business segment described herein. PRF is a limited-life vehicle seeking to dispose of its portfolio securities prior to its initial term expiring in the first half of 2015 - with two additional one-year terms based on performance or investor approval. Individual investor performance will vary based on their high water mark. Currently the majority of Class C share class investors have not reached their high water mark, so their performance is the same as their gross performance. AUM figure and net performance is for PRF as calculated by the applicable fund administrator.
Note: The AUM noted above includes investments in the relevant strategies by TFG, other than in respect of the Private Equity Vehicle, where there is no such investment. The Private Equity vehicle, at the time of the Polygon transaction and currently, remains a closed investment strategy. Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
Figure 16(i)
Polygon Hedge Funds Assets Under Management History ($MM)
(European Event-Driven Equity, Convertibles, Mining Equities, Distressed
Opportunities)
Sep-11 $372
Dec-11 $401
Mar-12 $444
Jun-12 $443
Sep-12 $440
Dec-12 $514
Mar-13 $590
Jun-13 $608
Sep-13 $670
Dec-13 $837
Mar-14 $910
Jun-14 $1,073
(i) All values are as calculated by the applicable fund administrators for value date
30 June 2014.
Convertibles: Polygon's convertible strategy invests primarily in convertible securities in Europe and North America and is led by CIO Mike Humphries. During the first half of 2014, the portfolio performed strongly with year-to-date net performance through the end of June 2014 at 12.6%. Annualised net performance since inception in May 2009 has been 21.2%.(25)
Year to date, the portfolio has been able to generate returns through idiosyncratic event-driven trades in the book despite the continuing richness of the broader convertible universe. The portfolio managers believe that there are still many attractive opportunities in these off-the-run names in which they specialize.
Assets under management in this strategy were $381.9 million at 30 June 2014.
European Event-Driven Equities: This strategy invests primarily in the major European equity markets, with an Event-Driven focus. Reade Griffith is the CIO.
The portfolio has continued to benefit in 2014 with the stabilisation of European markets and increased corporate activity. The portfolio managers believe that these trends, and improving capital flows to Europe, should continue to create a healthy opportunity set for the strategy for the rest of this year. A renewed interest in the region has also led to new investments into the product from third-party institutional investors. Year-to-date through 30 June 2014, the strategy has returned 6.8%; annualised performance from inception in July 2009 is 14.8%.(26)
Assets under management for the strategy were $542.3 million at 30 June 2014.
Mining Equities: This strategy is led by Mike Humphries and Peter Bell, and focuses primarily in the equities of global mining companies, many of them based on gold.
The strategy posted returns of 4.3% year-to-date through 30 June 2014. The portfolio continues to be long exploration and resource growth-oriented names and short producers of lower-quality gold deposits. Annualised performance from inception through to the end of June 2014 was 4.1%.(27)
Assets under management for the strategy at the end of June 2014 were $69.7 million.
Distressed Opportunities: This strategy is led by Olivier Blechner, and focuses on opportunities in companies undergoing, or about to undergo, balance sheet restructuring. The strategy was launched in September 2013. The team continues to build its portfolio and performance track record. Year-to-date through 30 June 2014, the strategy has returned 7.7%.(28)
Assets under management for the strategy at the end of June 2014 were $79.0 million.
Other Equities: These investments have returned 11.7% net performance through the end of June 2014. Annualised performance from inception through to the end of June 2014 was 18.0%. Assets under management in this category were $21.1 million at 30 June 2014.(29)
Private Equity: Polygon's portfolio of private and less-liquid public assets which are being sold down in a closed-ended investment vehicle had AUM of approximately $428.9 million at 30 June 2014. The fund has returned $375.0 million of cash to its partners since inception in March 2011, including $20.0 million in H1 2014. Year-to-date performance through the end of June was 0.11%.(30) TFG has not invested directly in this product; however, it is the beneficiary of certain contracted management fee income.
THIRD-PARTY FEE INCOME
In addition to the fee income generated by the three asset management businesses, TFG also currently receives asset management fee income derived from a number of one-off and long-term fee sharing arrangements with third-parties.
H1 2014
FINANCIAL REVIEW
In this section, we present consolidated financial data incorporating TFG and its 100% subsidiary, Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited, which includes both U.S. GAAP and non-U.S. GAAP metrics.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Figure 17
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Financial Highlights
H1 2014 H1 2013 H1 2012
U.S. GAAP net income ($MM) $71.9 $87.4 $132.6
Net economic income ($MM) $86.0 $99.6 $132.6
U.S. GAAP EPS $0.75 $0.89 $1.15
Adjusted EPS $0.90 $1.02 $1.15
Return on equity 4.8% 6.1% 8.2%
Net assets ($MM) $1,808.5 $1,680.3 $1,570.3
U.S. GAAP number of shares outstanding (MM) 94.2 97.6 115.0
U.S. GAAP NAV per share $19.19 $17.22 $13.75
Pro Forma number of shares outstanding (MM) 105.9 110.7 115.0
Pro Forma fully diluted NAV per share $17.08 $15.17 $13.75
DPS $0.155 $0.140 $0.115
We use, among others, the following metrics to understand the progress and performance of the business:
-Net Economic Income($86.0 million): adds back to the U.S. GAAP net income ($71.9 million) the imputed H1 2014 share based employee compensation ($11.5 million), which is generated on an ongoing basis resulting from the Polygon transaction and also includes unrealised net Polygon performance fees(31) ($2.5 million).
-Return on Equity (4.8%): Net Economic Income ($86.0 million) divided by Net Assets at the start of the year ($1,803.2 million).
-Pro Forma Fully Diluted Shares (105.9million): adjusts the U.S. GAAP shares outstanding (94.2 million) for the impact of escrow shares used as consideration in the Polygon transaction and associated stock dividends (11.6 million) and for the potential impact of options issued to TFG's investment manager at the time of TFG's IPO (0.0 million).
-Adjusted EPS ($0.90): calculated as Net Economic Income ($86.0 million) divided by weighted average U.S. GAAP shares outstanding (96.0 million).
-Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share ($17.08): calculated as Net Assets ($1,808.5 million) divided by Pro Forma Fully Diluted shares (105.9 million).(32)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Figure 18
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Statement of Operations
H1 2014 H1 2013 H1 2012
$MM $MM $MM
Interest income 85.3 109.8 115.8
Fee income 33.0 30.7 11.9
Unrealised Polygon performance fees 4.7 1.5 -
Other income - cost recovery 11.4 10.3 -
Investment income 134.4 152.3 127.7
Management and performance fees (33.1) (37.0) (47.8)
Other operating and administrative expenses (44.6) (33.3) (9.4)
Total operating expenses (77.7) (70.3) (57.2)
Net investment income 56.7 82.0 70.5
Net change in unrealised appreciation in investments (33.6) 9.4 68.2
Realised gain on investments 76.2 5.0 0.1
Realised and unrealised gains/(losses) from hedging, fx and options(9.4) 6.0 (3.6)
Net realised and unrealised gains from investments and fx 33.2 20.4 64.7
Net economic income before tax and noncontrolling interest 89.9 102.4 135.2
Income tax (3.9) (2.8) (1.6)
Noncontrolling interest - - (1.0)
Net economic income 86.0 99.6 132.6
Performance Fee
A performance fee of $8.1 million was accrued in Q2 2014 in accordance with TFG's investment management agreement and based on a "Reference NAV" of Q1 2014. The total performance fee accrued in H1 2014 was $18.7 million. The hurdle rate for the Q3 2014 incentive fee has been reset at 2.879658% (Q2 2014: 2.875958%) as per the process outlined in TFG's 2013 audited financial statements and in accordance with TFG's investment management agreement.
Please see TFG's website, http://www.tetragoninv.com/ and the 2013 TFG audited financial statements for more details on the calculation of this fee.
Figure 19
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Statement of Operations by Segment H1 2014
Investment Portfolio TFG AM Total
$MM $MM $MM
Interest income 85.2 0.1 85.3
Fee income - 33.0 33.0
Unrealised Polygon performance fees - 4.7 4.7
Other income - cost recovery - 11.4 11.4
Investment and management fee income 85.2 49.2 134.4
Management and performance fees (29.3) (3.8) (33.1)
Other operating and administrative expenses (9.8) (34.8) (44.6)
Total operating expenses (39.1) (38.6) (77.7)
Net change in unrealised appreciation in
investments (39.3) 5.7 (33.6)
Realised gain on investments 76.2 - 76.2
Realised and unrealised losses from
hedging, fx and options (9.4) - (9.4)
Net realised and unrealised gains from
investments and fx 27.5 5.7 33.2
Net economic income before tax 73.6 16.3 89.9
Figure 20
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Balance Sheet as at 30 June 2014 and 31 December 2013
Q2 2014 Q4 2013
$MM $MM
Assets
Investments, at fair value 1,445.4 1,533.0
Management contracts 33.1 36.5
Cash and cash equivalents 258.9 245.9
Amounts due from brokers 73.0 42.0
Derivative financial assets 13.3 15.2
Property, plant and equipment 0.2 0.3
Deferred tax asset and income tax receivable 8.7 8.3
Other receivables 40.6 26.5
Total assets 1,873.2 1,907.7
Liabilities
Other payables and accrued expenses 39.9 79.8
Amounts payable on share options 11.3 10.7
Deferred tax liability and income tax payable 9.6 10.7
Derivative financial liabilities 3.9 3.3
Total liabilities 64.7 104.5
Net assets 1,808.5 1,803.2
Figure 21
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Statement of Cash Flows
H1 2014 H1 2013 H1 2012
$MM $MM $MM
Operating Activities
Operating cash flows after incentive fees and before
movements in working capital 134.6 183.6 172.6
Change in payables / receivables (2.8) (0.2) (2.3)
Cash flows from operating activities 131.8 183.4 170.3
Investment Activities
Proceeds on sales of investments
- Proceeds sale of CLOs 128.0 - 0.2
- Net proceeds from swap resets (11.8) - -
- Proceeds sale of bank loans and maturity and
prepayment of investments 12.5 84.9 54.0
- Proceeds on realisation of real estate investments 26.7 6.8 -
- Proceeds from GreenOak working capital repayment 2.6 - -
Purchase of investments
- Purchase of CLOs (63.6) (45.5) (66.1)
- Purchase of bank loans (1.4) (13.9) (34.3)
- Purchase of real estate investments (50.1) (17.0) (5.8)
- Investments in asset managers - (0.5) (2.7)
- Investments in Polygon Equity Funds - (60.0) -
- Investments in Polygon Credit, Convertibles
and Distressed Funds (25.0) (10.0) -
- Investments in Other Equities, Credit,
Convertibles and Distressed (27.3) - -
Cash flows from operating and investing activities 122.4 128.2 115.6
Amounts due from broker (31.0) (20.0) 9.3
Net purchase of shares (49.2) (13.7) (12.3)
Dividends paid to shareholders (29.0) (26.4) (24.2)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interest - - (0.7)
Cash flows from financing activities (109.2) (60.1) (27.9)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 13.2 68.1 87.8
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 245.9 175.9 211.5
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on
cash and cash equivalents (0.2) (0.2) (0.2)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 258.9 243.8 299.1
Figure 22
Net Economic Income to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation
30 Jun
2014
$MM
Net economic income 86.0
Share based employee compensation (11.5)
Unrealised Polygon performance fees (4.7)
Imputed tax charge on unrealised Polygon performance fees 1.4
Estimated TFM incentive fee on unrealised Polygon performance fees 0.8
U.S. GAAP net income 71.9
TFG is primarily reporting earnings through a non-GAAP measurement called Net Economic Income.
The reconciliation on the table above shows the adjustment required to get from this measure of earnings to U.S. GAAP net income. There are currently two categories of adjusting items: share based employee compensation of $11.5 million; and net performance fee earned but not accrued of $2.5 million, after taking into account an imputed tax charge and incentive fee payable to TFM thereon.
In relation to the share based compensation, under ASC 805 TFG is recognizing the value of the shares given in consideration for the Polygon transaction as employee compensation over the period in which they are vesting.
This mechanic and future vesting schedule are described in more detail in the Master Fund audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2013, and the unaudited financial statements for the period ended 30 June 2014.
Unrealised Polygon performance fees represent the fees calculated by the applicable administrator of the relevant Polygon funds, in accordance with the applicable fund constitutional documents, when determining NAV at quarter end, less certain assumed costs. Similar amounts, if any, from LCM and GreenOak are excluded from this line item. Such fees would typically not be realised or recognised under U.S. GAAP until calendar year end, and are therefore subject to change based on fund performance during the remainder of the year. There are can be no assurance that the company will realise all or any portion of such amounts. Through 30 June 2014, this amount equalled $4.7 million before (1) an assumed imputed tax charge and (2) estimated TFM performance fees reduced the net contribution to $2.5 million as shown in Figure 11and further represented in Figures 18 and 19 of this report. It also includes any unrealised performance fees to potentially be paid on investments made by TFG in Polygon hedge funds or other investment vehicles. TFG is able to invest at a preferred level of fees.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
CERTAIN REGULATORY INFORMATION
This Performance Report constitutes TFG's semi-annual financial report as required pursuant to Section 5:25d of the Dutch Financial Markets Supervision Act ("FMSA"). Pursuant to Section 5:25d and 5:25m of the FMSA, this report is made public by means of a press release and has been filed with the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiele Markten) and also made available to the public by way of publication on the TFG website (http://www.tetragoninv.com).
An investment in TFG involves substantial risks. Please refer to the Company's website at http://www.tetragoninv.com/ for a description of the risks and uncertainties pertaining to an investment in TFG.
This release does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction. The securities of TFG have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to U.S. persons unless they are registered under applicable law or exempt from registration. TFG does not intend to register any portion of its securities in the United States or to conduct a public offer of securities in the United States. In addition, TFG has not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, and investors will not be entitled to the benefits of such Act. TFG is registered in the public register of the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets under Section 1:107 of the FMSA as a collective investment scheme from a designated country. This release constitutes regulated information ("gereglementeerde informative") within the meaning of Section 1:1 of the FMSA.
TFG shares (the "Shares") are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale and the Euronext Amsterdam N.V. trading market is less liquid than other major exchanges, which could affect the price of the Shares.
There are additional restrictions on the resale of Shares by Shareholders who are located in the United States or who are U.S. persons and on the resale of Shares by any Shareholder to any person who is located in the United States or is a U.S. person. These restrictions include that each Shareholder who is located in the United States or who is a U.S. person must be a "Qualified Purchaser" or a "Knowledgeable Employee" (each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940), and, accordingly, that Shares may be resold to a person located in the United States or who is a U.S. person only if such person is a "Qualified Purchaser" or a "Knowledgeable Employee" under the Investment Company Act of 1940. These restrictions may adversely affect overall liquidity of the Shares.
DIRECTORS'STATEMENTS
The Directors of TFGconfirmthat(i)thisPerformance Report constitutes theTFG management review for the six month period ended 30 June 2014 and contains a fair review of that period and (ii) the financial statements in the accompanying unaudited interim report for the six month period ended 30 June 2014 for TFG have been prepared in accordance with applicable laws and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
APPENDIX II
FAIRVALUE DETERMINATION OF TFG'S CLOEQUITY INVESTMENTS
In accordance with the valuation policies set forth on TFG's website, the values of TFG's CLO equity investments are determined using a third-party cash flow modelling tool. The model contains certain assumption inputs that are reviewed and adjusted as appropriate to factor in how historic, current and potential market developments (examined through, for example, forward- looking observable data) might potentially impact the performance of TFG's CLO equity investments. Since this involves modelling, among other things, forward projections over multiple years, this is not an exercise in recalibrating future assumptions to the latest quarter's historical data.
Subject to the foregoing, when determining the U.S. GAAP-compliant fair value of TFG's portfolio, the company seeks to derive a value at which market participants could transact in an orderly market and also seeks to benchmark the model inputs and resulting outputs to observable market data when available and appropriate.
Forward-looking CLO equity cash flow modelling assumptions unchanged at the end of Q22014:
The Investment Manager reviews and, when appropriate, adjusts in consultation with TFG's audit committee the CLO equity investment portfolio's modelling assumptions as described above. At the end of Q2 2014, certain key assumptions relating to defaults, recoveries, prepayments and reinvestment prices were unchanged from the previous quarter. This was the case across both U.S. and European deals.
These key average assumption variables include the modelling assumptions disclosed as a weighted average (by U.S. dollar amount) of the individual deal assumptions, aggregated by geography (i.e. U.S. and European). Such weighted averages may change from month to month due to movements in the amortised costs of the deals, even without changes to the underlying assumptions. Each individual deal's assumptions may differ from this geographical average and vary across the portfolio.
The reinvestment price, assumptions about reinvestment spread and reinvestment life are also input into the model to generate an effective spread over LIBOR. Newer vintage CLOs may have a higher weighted-average reinvestment spread over LIBOR or shorter reinvestment life assumptions than older deals. Across the entire CLO portfolio, for those deals still in their reinvestment periods, the reinvestment price assumption of 100% for U.S. deals and European deals with their respective assumed weighted-average reinvestment spreads, generates an effective spread over LIBOR of approximately 362 bps on broadly syndicated U.S. loans and 279 bps on European loans. All middle market loan deals are through the end of their reinvestment periods.
Figure 23
U.S. CLOs
Variable Year Current Assumptions
CADR
Until deal maturity 1.0x WARF-implied default rate (2.2%)
Recovery Rate
Until deal maturity 73%
Prepayment Rate
Until deal maturity 20.0% p.a. on loans; 0.0% on bonds
Reinvestment Price
Until deal maturity 100%
Figure 24
European CLOs
Variable Year Current Assumptions
CADR
2014 1.25x WARF-implied default rate (2.6%)
Thereafter 1.0x WARF-implied default rate (2.1%)
Recovery Rate Until deal maturity 68%
Prepayment Rate Until deal maturity 20.0% p.a. on loans; 0.0% on bonds
Reinvestment Price Until deal maturity 100%
Application of Discount Rate to Projected CLO Equity Cash Flows: U.S. CLO 1.0 Equity-discount rates reduced from 13% to 12%
In determining the applicable rates to use to discount projected cash flows, an analysis of observable risk premium data is undertaken. For U.S. CLOs, observable risk premia such as BB and BBB CLO tranche spreads maintained previous reductions and have been extremely stable at the current low levels.
For example, according to Citibank research, BB spreads which were 5.0% at the end of Q4 2013, ended Q2 2014 at 5.1%, whilst BBB spreads reduced from 3.2% at the end of Q1 2014 to 3.0% at the end of Q2 2014.
In the second quarter, TFG sold seven U.S. CLO 1.0 positions, all at or above their carrying values as calculated using a 13% discount rate, and other market related information, such as broker research and bid lists, strongly indicated that discount rates or yields had continued to compress. Taking into account all of the factors outlined above, this discount rate has been reduced to 12%. The future movement of mezzanine tranche spreads as well as the likely range of spreads of equity discount rates over such spreads, among other factors, will continue to be monitored in coming quarters.
European CLOEquity - discount rates reducedfrom 16% to 14%
Like their U.S. equivalents, European BB-rated tranche yields have continued exhibit stability at these current low levels. For example, these are unchanged at 6.9% compared to the end of the previous quarter, which is less than 2% higher than the U.S. CLO 1.0 BB spreads (see above). Notwithstanding the potential higher risks connected with the ongoing Eurozone issues, we believe that the stability of the differential between European and U.S. mezzanine spreads is indicative, among other things, of a genuine compression in risk premium between the two geographies over the last few quarters. In order to better reflect this factor outlined above and the stability of mezzanine spreads at the current low levels, the discount rate applied to European deal projected cash flows has been reduced to 14% from 16%. This squeezes the differential on discount rates used on U.S. pre-crisis deals and European deals to 2%. The observable range of European risk premia over the U.S. equivalent, among other factors, will continue to be monitored in coming quarters.
Historically, we have characterised the difference arising where fair value is lower than the amortised cost for the portfolio, which can occur when the discount rates used to discount future cash flows when determining fair value are higher than the modelled IRRs, as the "ALR Fair Value Adjustment" or "ALR". For European deals at the end of Q2 2014, the ALR stood at $17.8 million, compared to $31.6 million at the end of Q1 2014. As explained in prior releases, the ALR is now zero for U.S. deals. Given the foregoing, we currently do not expect to report this number on a quarterly basis going forward.
U.S. CLO 2.0 Equity-discounted using dealIRR
The applicable discount rate for newer vintage deals is determined with reference to each deal's specific IRR, which, in the absence of other consistently available observable data points, is deemed to be the most appropriate indication of the current risk premium on these structures. At the end of Q2 2014, the weighted-average discount rate (and IRR) on these deals was 11.4%. Such deals represented approximately 27.1% of the CLO equity portfolio by fair value (up from 20.6% at the end of Q1 2014). We will continue to monitor observable data on these newer vintage transactions to determine whether the IRR remains the appropriate discount rate.
Effect on fair value and netincome ofthe recalibration of discount rates
Overall, the net impact of the recalibration of discount rates described above led to an overall increase in fair value of the total CLO equity portfolio of approximately $21.3 million, or $16.0 million in bottom line net income.
APPENDIX III
ADDITIONAL CLO PORTFOLIO STATISTICS
Each individual deal's metrics used in the calculation of the figures below will differ from the overall averages and vary across the portfolio.
[Figure 25]
Figure 26
ALL CLOs Q2 2014 Q1 2014 Q4 2013 Q3 2013 Q2 2013 Q1 2013
Caa1/CCC+ or Below Obligors: 3.7% 4.6% 5.4% 4.9% 5.0% 5.1%
WARF: 2,621 2,565 2,542 2,553 2,568 2,541
U.S. CLOs Q2 2014 Q1 2014 Q4 2013 Q3 2013 Q2 2013 Q1 2013
Caa1/CCC+ or Below Obligors: 3.0% 3.4% 3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 4.0%
WARF: 2,556 2,544 2,513 2,534 2,550 2,510
EUR CLOs Q2 2014 Q1 2014 Q4 2013 Q3 2013 Q2 2013 Q1 2013
Caa1/CCC+ or Below Obligors: 6.9% 9.4% 11.8% 9.1% 8.7% 9.7%
WARF: 2,894 2,650 2,658 2,631 2,642 2,670
Figure 26 (cont.)
ALL CLOs Q4 2012 Q3 2012 Q2 2012 Q1 2012 Q4 2011 Q3 2011
Caa1/CCC+ or Below Obligors: 6.0% 6.4% 5.7% 6.2% 7.0% 7.0%
WARF: 2,599 2,605 2,578 2,588 2,624 2,614
U.S. CLOs Q4 2012 Q3 2012 Q2 2012 Q1 2012 Q4 2011 Q3 2011
Caa1/CCC+ or Below Obligors: 4.5% 4.9% 4.2% 4.8% 5.5% 5.5%
WARF: 2,524 2,528 2,491 2,504 2,533 2,522
EUR CLOs Q4 2012 Q3 2012 Q2 2012 Q1 2012 Q4 2011 Q3 2011
Caa1/CCC+ or Below Obligors: 11.7% 12.2% 11.6% 11.1% 12.3% 12.0%
WARF: 2,896 2,903 2,910 2,900 2,948 2,941
CLO EQUITY PORTFOLIO DETAILSASOF 30JUNE 2014
Figure 27
CLO Equity Portfolio Details
As of 30 June 2014
Original Deal End of Wtd Avg Original
Invest. Cost Closing Year of Reinv Spread Cost of Funds
Transaction(i) Deal Type ($MM USD)(ii) Date Maturity Period (bps)(iii) (bps)(iv)
Transaction 1 EUR CLO 37.5 2007 2024 2014 380 55
Transaction 2 EUR CLO 29.7 2006 2023 2013 407 52
Transaction 3 EUR CLO 22.2 2006 2022 2012 425 58
Transaction 4 EUR CLO 33.0 2007 2023 2013 419 48
Transaction 5 EUR CLO 36.9 2007 2022 2014 401 60
Transaction 6 EUR CLO 33.3 2006 2022 2012 384 51
Transaction 7 EUR CLO 38.5 2007 2023 2013 406 46
Transaction 8 EUR CLO 26.9 2005 2021 2011 396 53
Transaction 10 EUR CLO 27.0 2006 2022 2012 385 50
Transaction 86 EUR CLO 3.6 2006 2022 2012 385 50
EUR CLO Subtotal: 288.6 399 52
Transaction 11 US CLO 20.5 2006 2018 2012 298 45
Transaction 12 US CLO 22.8 2006 2019 2013 320 46
Transaction 13 US CLO 15.2 2006 2018 2012 317 47
Transaction 14 US CLO 26.0 2007 2021 2014 332 49
Transaction 15 US CLO 28.1 2007 2021 2014 407 52
Transaction 16 US CLO 23.5 2006 2020 2013 381 46
Transaction 17 US CLO 26.0 2007 2021 2014 320 40
Transaction 18 US CLO 16.7 2005 2017 2011 290 45
Transaction 19 US CLO 1.2 2005 2017 2011 290 45
Transaction 20 US CLO 26.6 2006 2020 2012 402 52
Transaction 21 US CLO 20.7 2006 2020 2012 383 53
Transaction 22 US CLO 37.4 2007 2021 2014 397 53
Transaction 23 US CLO 19.9 2007 2021 2013 315 66
Transaction 24 US CLO 16.9 2006 2018 2012 365 46
Transaction 25 US CLO 20.9 2006 2018 2013 389 46
Transaction 26 US CLO 27.9 2007 2019 2013 410 43
Transaction 29 US CLO 19.1 2005 2018 2011 475 66
Transaction 30 US CLO 12.4 2006 2018 2012 420 67
Transaction 31 US CLO 9.5 2005 2017 2012 321 52
Transaction 32 US CLO 24.0 2007 2021 2014 308 59
Transaction 33 US CLO 16.2 2006 2020 2012 354 56
Transaction 34 US CLO 22.2 2006 2020 2012 354 50
Transaction 35 US CLO 23.6 2006 2018 2012 422 52
Transaction 36 US CLO 28.4 2007 2021 2013 366 46
Transaction 38 US CLO 23.7 2007 2021 2013 313 42
Transaction 39 US CLO 7.8 2005 2017 2011 400 70
Transaction 40 US CLO 13.0 2006 2020 2011 349 39
Transaction 44 US CLO 22.3 2006 2018 2012 122 54
Transaction 45 US CLO 23.0 2006 2018 2012 280 46
Transaction 46 US CLO 21.3 2007 2019 2013 290 51
Transaction 47 US CLO 28.3 2006 2021 2013 331 47
Transaction 49 US CLO 12.6 2005 2017 2011 371 40
Transaction 50 US CLO 12.3 2006 2018 2012 371 40
Transaction 56 US CLO 23.0 2007 2019 2014 336 42
Transaction 57 US CLO 0.6 2007 2019 2014 336 42
Transaction 58 US CLO 21.8 2007 2019 2014 339 49
Transaction 59 US CLO 0.4 2007 2019 2014 339 49
Transaction 61 US CLO 29.1 2007 2021 2014 322 45
Transaction 62 US CLO 25.3 2007 2020 2013 315 42
Transaction 63 US CLO 27.3 2007 2021 2013 357 53
Transaction 64 US CLO 15.4 2007 2021 2013 376 38
Transaction 65 US CLO 26.9 2006 2021 2013 355 47
Transaction 66 US CLO 21.3 2006 2020 2013 292 49
Transaction 68 US CLO 19.3 2006 2020 2013 336 48
Transaction 69 US CLO 28.2 2007 2019 2013 317 44
Transaction 71 US CLO 1.7 2006 2018 2012 371 40
Transaction 72 US CLO 4.8 2007 2019 2014 336 42
Transaction 73 US CLO 1.9 2007 2019 2014 336 42
Transaction 74 US CLO 5.5 2007 2019 2014 339 49
Transaction 75 US CLO 32.7 2011 2022 2014 378 168
Transaction 76 US CLO 1.9 2006 2018 2012 280 46
Transaction 77 US CLO 14.5 2011 2023 2016 394 212
Transaction 78 US CLO 22.9 2012 2023 2015 459 217
Transaction 79 US CLO 19.4 2012 2022 2015 398 215
Transaction 80 US CLO 22.7 2012 2022 2016 399 185
Transaction 81 US CLO 21.7 2012 2024 2016 421 216
Transaction 82 US CLO 25.4 2012 2022 2016 402 206
Transaction 83 US CLO 20.8 2013 2025 2017 465 193
Transaction 84 US CLO 24.6 2013 2023 2017 396 183
Transaction 85 US CLO 1.0 2013 2025 2017 402 170
Transaction 87 US CLO 23.0 2013 2026 2018 409 199
Transaction 88 US CLO 30.1 2014 2024 2018 423 199
Transaction 89 US CLO 33.6 2014 2026 2018 368 195
US CLO Subtotal: 1,216.4 360 84
Total CLO Portfolio: 1,505.0 367 78
Figure 27
CLO Equity Portfolio Details (continued)
As of 30 June 2014
Current
Please align columns to the table below.
Current Jr- Jr-Most O/C Annualized ITD Cash
Cost of Funds Most O/C Cushion at (Loss) Gain Received as
Transaction(i)(bps)(v) Cushion(vi) Close(vii) of Cushion(viii) IRR(ix) % of Cost(x)
Transaction 1 58 0.86% 3.86% (0.43%) 0.5% 36.4%
Transaction 2 66 1.38% 3.60% (0.29%) 10.4% 108.3%
Transaction 3 92 4.40% 5.14% (0.09%) 11.4% 129.2%
Transaction 4 54 7.45% 5.76% 0.23% 15.3% 138.8%
Transaction 5 56 0.77% 5.74% (0.72%) 10.2% 94.5%
Transaction 6 72 9.63% 4.70% 0.61% 5.7% 51.8%
Transaction 7 53 7.35% 3.64% 0.51% 6.7% 41.7%
Transaction 8 106 16.75% 4.98% 1.32% 8.8% 109.9%
Transaction 10 73 1.87% 4.54% (0.34%) 0.3% 44.1%
Transaction 86 73 1.87% 3.11% (0.16%) 8.3% 15.9%
EUR CLO Subtotal: 68 5.39% 4.61% 0.07% 79.9%
Transaction 11 56 9.52% 4.55% 0.64% 20.4% 189.7%
Transaction 12 58 10.71% 4.45% 0.82% 20.3% 188.4%
Transaction 13 53 2.71% 4.82% (0.27%) 21.8% 209.3%
Transaction 14 50 2.94% 5.63% (0.37%) 19.0% 191.2%
Transaction 15 48 3.67% 4.21% (0.08%) 29.7% 242.8%
Transaction 16 51 4.81% 4.44% 0.05% 21.0% 210.7%
Transaction 17 40 4.52% 4.24% 0.04% 24.0% 205.7%
Transaction 18 57 11.81% 4.77% 0.81% 19.9% 200.6%
Transaction 19 57 11.81% 4.77% 0.81% 23.7% 194.8%
Transaction 20 88 7.41% 5.28% 0.28% 22.2% 202.0%
Transaction 21 90 7.74% 4.76% 0.38% 18.4% 180.4%
Transaction 22 53 3.29% 5.00% (0.23%) 21.9% 191.4%
Transaction 23 174 12.11% 4.98% 1.00% 20.1% 178.0%
Transaction 24 57 9.18% 4.17% 0.64% 18.0% 181.5%
Transaction 25 58 12.35% 4.13% 1.09% 22.5% 200.2%
Transaction 26 59 11.97% 4.05% 1.09% 19.2% 181.9%
Transaction 29 N/A N/A 4.82% N/A 18.9% 204.7%
Transaction 30 149 7.92% 5.16% 0.34% 18.1% 178.1%
Transaction 31 139 13.82% 5.02% 0.97% 16.2% 192.4%
Transaction 32 59 4.38% 5.57% (0.17%) 21.7% 189.1%
Transaction 33 157 11.11% 6.99% 0.50% 13.8% 163.4%
Transaction 34 74 7.86% 6.66% 0.16% 18.8% 190.2%
Transaction 35 263 35.11% 5.00% 3.75% 19.3% 175.7%
Transaction 36 66 2.75% 5.18% (0.33%) 19.1% 175.8%
Transaction 38 60 8.80% 5.07% 0.51% 27.7% 231.7%
Transaction 39 N/A N/A 3.15% N/A 8.5% 137.6%
Transaction 40 70 N/A N/A N/A 21.0% 188.8%
Transaction 44 485 54.80% 4.16% 6.22% 10.2% 126.1%
Transaction 45 112 7.40% 4.46% 0.39% 8.3% 118.2%
Transaction 46 102 5.10% 4.33% 0.11% 7.2% 109.3%
Transaction 47 45 3.60% 4.34% (0.10%) 22.5% 204.1%
Transaction 49 74 9.75% 3.94% 0.67% 11.7% 130.0%
Transaction 50 63 8.54% 4.25% 0.53% 12.7% 135.2%
Transaction 56 52 4.48% 4.53% (0.01%) 22.2% 194.6%
Transaction 57 52 4.48% 4.53% (0.01%) 47.4% 1121.2%
Transaction 58 54 4.40% 4.04% 0.05% 24.8% 207.4%
Transaction 59 54 4.40% 4.04% 0.05% 52.0% 1600.2%
Transaction 61 45 2.08% 4.04% (0.27%) 18.0% 163.1%
Transaction 62 51 5.73% 5.20% 0.07% 22.4% 205.0%
Transaction 63 59 3.01% 4.78% (0.25%) 19.6% 186.8%
Transaction 64 45 N/A N/A N/A 23.1% 208.4%
Transaction 65 67 6.97% 4.96% 0.26% 14.6% 151.3%
Transaction 66 50 3.40% 4.05% (0.08%) 22.7% 209.9%
Transaction 68 50 6.60% 4.41% 0.29% 27.7% 252.1%
Transaction 69 45 7.41% 5.61% 0.25% 26.7% 236.1%
Transaction 71 63 8.54% 4.25% 0.53% 27.8% 103.7%
Transaction 72 52 4.48% 4.53% (0.01%) 18.2% 96.3%
Transaction 73 52 4.48% 4.53% (0.01%) 18.2% 96.3%
Transaction 74 54 4.40% 4.04% 0.05% 21.5% 104.8%
Transaction 75 168 4.47% 4.05% 0.14% 11.7% 62.7%
Transaction 76 112 7.40% 2.43% 0.66% 32.1% 116.9%
Transaction 77 213 5.77% 5.04% 0.29% 13.5% 45.1%
Transaction 78 217 5.90% 4.00% 0.78% 15.4% 61.8%
Transaction 79 179 4.06% 4.00% 0.02% 9.1% 40.3%
Transaction 80 185 4.06% 4.17% (0.05%) 11.0% 42.5%
Transaction 81 217 4.79% 4.00% 0.44% 8.0% 30.3%
Transaction 82 207 4.11% 4.00% 0.06% 8.1% 30.3%
Transaction 83 193 6.86% 6.17% 0.51% 13.9% 25.1%
Transaction 84 184 4.12% 4.02% 0.07% 15.9% 35.5%
Transaction 85 171 5.04% 5.01% 0.04% 9.5% 18.5%
Transaction 87 199 4.19% 4.00% 0.33% 6.4% 0.0%
Transaction 88 200 4.04% 4.02% 0.06% 12.5% 0.0%
Transaction 89 195 3.96% 3.96% - 12.0% 0.0%
US CLO Subtotal: 108 7.16% 4.51% 0.38% 150.0%
Total CLO Portfolio: 100 6.82% 4.53% 0.32% 136.6%
Notes
(i)Transactions are investments made on a particular investment date. Multiple transactions may be associated with the same tranche of the same CLO deal. Note that certain transactions may have been removed from the table above, as the remaining value of the assets of those CLOs is immaterial. Such transactions may continue to be held as of the date of this report.
(ii)The USD investment cost reflects a USD-EUR exchange rate fixed at a single historical rate to avoid the impact of skewed weightings and FX volatility over time. As such, the investment costs of European CLOs as shown in this table may not be comparable to the investments costs as shown in TFG's financial statements.
(iii) Par weighted-average spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR (as appropriate) of the underlying loan assets in each CLO's portfolio.
(iv) Notional weighted-average spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR (as appropriate) of the debt tranches issued by each CLO, as of the closing date of each transaction.
(v)Notional weighted-average spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR (as appropriate) of the debt tranches issued by each CLO, as of the most recent trustee report date.
(vi) The current junior-most O/C cushion is the excess (or deficit) of the junior-most O/C test ratio over the test requirement, as of the latest trustee report available as of the report date.
(vii) The junior-most O/C cushion at close is the excess (or deficit) of the junior-most O/C test ratio over the test requirement that was expected on each deal's closing date. Please note that two of TFG's investments are so called "par structures" which don't include a junior O/C test. They have been marked by an "N/A" in the relevant junior-most O/C test columns.
(viii) Calculated by annualizing the change from the expected closing date junior-most O/C cushion to the current junior-most O/C cushion.
(ix) Calculated from TFG's investment date. Includes both historical cash flows received to-date and prospective cash flows expected to be received, based on TFG's base case modeling assumptions.
(x)Inception to report date cash flow received on each transaction as a percentage of its original cost.
CLO EQUITY PORTFOLIO DETAILS (CONTINUED) AS OF 30 JUNE 2014
[Figure 28]
APPENDIX IV
SHARE RECONCILIATION AND SHAREHOLDINGS
U.S. GAAP TO FULLY DILUTEDSHARES RECONCILIATION
Figure 29(24)
Share Reconciliation and Shareholdings
U.S. GAAP to Fully Diluted Shares Reconciliation
30 Jun 2014
Shares (MM)
Legal Shares Issued and Outstanding 135.24
Less: Shares Held In Subsidiary (16.60)
Less: Shares Held In Treasury (12.80)
Less: Escrow Shares(33.i) (11.60)
U.S. GAAP Shares Outstanding 94.24
Add: Manager (IPO) Share Options(33.ii) 0.04
Add: Escrow Shares(33.i) 11.60
Pro Forma Fully Diluted Shares 105.88
BOARD OFDIRECTORS
Paddy Dear Reade Griffith Rupert Dorey*
Frederic Hervouet* Byron Knief* David Jeffreys*
*Independent Director
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Registered Office of TFG and theMaster Fund
Tetragon Financial Group Limited
Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited
1st Floor Dorey Court
Admiral Park
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GY1 6HJ
Investment Manager
Tetragon Financial Management LP
399 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10022
United States of America
General Partner of Investment Manager
Tetragon Financial Management GP LLC
399 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10022
United States of America
Investor Relations
David Wishnow / Greg Wadsworth ir@tetragoninv.com
Press Inquiries
Sard Verbinnen & Co tetragon-svc@sardverb.com
Auditors
KPMG Channel Islands Ltd.
20 New Street
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GY1 4AN
Sub-Registrar and TransferAgent
Computershare
One Wall Street
New York, NY 10286
United States of America
Issuing Agent, Dutch Paying andTransferAgent
Kas Bank N.V. Spuistraat 172
1012 VT Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Legal Advisor(as to U.S. law) Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10019
United States of America
Legal Advisor (as to Guernsey law)
Ogier
Ogier House
St. Julian's Avenue
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GY1 1WA
Legal Advisor (as to Dutch law)
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V. Claude Debussylaan 80
1082 MD Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Stock Listing
Euronext Amsterdam N.V.
Administrator and Registrar
State Street (Guernsey) Limited
1st Floor Dorey Court
Admiral Park
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GY1 6HJ
END NOTES
Executive Summary and Outlook
(1) TFG invests substantially all its capital through a master fund, Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited ("TFGMF"), in which it holds 100% of the issued shares. In this report, unless otherwise stated, we report on the consolidated business incorporating TFG and TFGMF. References to "we" or "our" are to Tetragon Financial Management LP, TFG's investment manager.
(2) TFG's returns will most likely fluctuate with LIBOR. LIBOR directly flows through some of TFG's investments and, as it can be seen as the risk-free short-term rate, it should affect all of TFG's investments. In high-LIBOR environments, TFG should achieve higher sustainable returns; in low- LIBOR environments, TFG should achieve lower sustainable returns.
(3) "U.S. CLO 1.0" refers to U.S. CLOs issued before or during 2008. "U.S. CLO 2.0" refers to U.S. CLOs issued after 2008.
(4) Please see endnote 2.
(5) The percentage of TFG's capital that is externally managed is calculated by dividing the sum of the U.S. GAAP fair value of all investment assets managed by parties other than TFG or its affiliates, by the total Net Asset Value of the company.
(6) Includes GreenOak funds and advisory assets, AUM for Polygon Recovery Fund LP, Polygon Convertible Opportunity Master Fund, Polygon European Equity Opportunity Master Fund and associated managed account, Polygon Mining Opportunity Master Fund, Polygon Global Equities Master Fund and Polygon Distressed Opportunities Master Fund, as calculated by the applicable administrator for value date 30 June 2014. Includes, where relevant, investments by Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited. TFG Asset Management AUM as used in this report includes the assets under management of several investment advisers, including Tetragon Asset Management L.P., and GreenOak Real Estate, LP, each of which is an investment manager registered under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
(7) Fee income nets off cost of recovery on "Other fee income" against this cost contained in "Operating, employee, and administrative expenses," and includes amounts earned through third-party fee sharing arrangements. It also includes any fees earned through fees paid on investments made by TFG in Polygon hedge funds or other investment vehicles. TFG is able to invest at a preferred level of fees.
Key Metrics
(8) Please refer to Financial Highlights on page 26 of this report for the definition of Return on Equity or "RoE".
(9) Please see endnote 2.
(10) Please refer to Financial Highlights on page 26 of this report for the definition of Net Economic Income.
(11) Please refer to Financial Highlights on page 26 of this report for the definition of Adjusted EPS.
(12) Please refer to Financial Highlights on page 26 of this report for the definition of Pro Forma Fully Diluted Shares and Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share.
(13) Please see endnote 2.
(14) Includes an amount receivable at 30 June 2014 of $25.1 million relating to the sale of a CLO position.
Investment Portfolio
(15) The CLO asset characterisations referenced above reflect the primary asset focus of the vehicles.
These transactions, however, may allow for limited exposure to other asset classes including unsecured loans, high yield bonds, or structured finance securities.
(16) For each CLO, TFG's indirect exposure to the underlying assets is calculated by multiplying the total par amount of the CLO's assets by the percentage of the equity tranche owned by TFG. Each CLO's data is as of the date of the latest available trustee report.
(17) Please note that TFG may hold more than one investment in any CLO transaction within its portfolio.
(18) Based on the most recent trustee reports available as of 30 June 2014.
(19) Based on the most recent trustee reports available as of 30 June 2014.
(20) Based on the most recent trustee reports available as of 30 June 2014.
(21) Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. TFG invests in Polygon-managed funds on a preferred fee-basis.
TFG Asset Management
(22) TFG owns a 23% stake in GreenOak and for accounting purposes treats this stake as an investment rather than consolidating the underlying net assets and net income of this business. Any change in the calculated fair value of the 23% stake in GreenOak will be reflected through the TFG Asset Management segment below the EBITDA equivalent line. During Q2 2014, as the result of a recalibration of the fair value of this stake, $5.7 million of value was recognised in the TFG Asset Management Statement of Operations.
(23) Unrealised Polygon performance fees represent the fees calculated by the applicable administrator of the relevant Polygon funds, in accordance with the applicable fund constitutional documents, when determining net asset value at quarter end, less certain assumed costs. Similar amounts, if any, from LCM and GreenOak are excluded from this line item. Such fees would typically not be realised or recognised under U.S. GAAP until calendar year end, and are therefore subject to change based on fund performance during the remainder of the year. There are can be no assurance that the company will realise all or any portion of such amounts. Through 30 June 2014, this amount equalled $4.7 million before (1) an assumed imputed tax charge and (2) estimated TFM performance fees reduced the net contribution to $2.5 million as shown in Figure 11 and further represented in Figures 18 and 19 of this report.
(24) The LCM IV, LCM V, LCM VI, LCM IX, LCM X, LCM XI, LCM XII, LCM XIII, LCM XIV, LCM XV and LCM XVI CLOs are referred to as the "LCM Cash Flow CLOs." These statistics do not include the performance of certain transactions that were developed and previously managed by a third-party prior to being assigned to LCM, some of which continue to be managed by LCM.
(25) The Polygon Convertible Opportunity Fund began trading with Class B shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 20 May 2009. Class A shares of the fund were first issued on 1 April 2010 and returns from inception through March 2010 have been pro forma adjusted to match the fund's Class A share terms as set forth in the Offering Memorandum (1.5% management fee, 20% incentive fee over a hurdle and other items, in each case, as set forth in the Offering Memorandum). From April 2010, forward, the reported returns reflect actual Class A share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. The return figures shown are final values as calculated by the applicable fund administrator. Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
(26) The Polygon European Equity Opportunity Fund began trading 8 July 2009 with Class B shares which carry no incentive fee. Class A shares commenced trading on 1 December 2009. Returns from inception through November 2009 for Class A shares have been pro forma adjusted to match the fund's Class A share terms as set forth in the Offering Memorandum (1.5% management fee, 20% incentive fee and other items, in each case, as set forth in the offering Memorandum). From December 2009 to February 2011, reported performance reflects actual Class A share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. From March 2011, forward, the table reflects actual Class A1 share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. Class A1 share performance is equivalent to Class A share performance for prior periods. The return figures shown are final values as calculated by the applicable fund administrator. Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
(27) The Polygon Mining Opportunity Fund began trading with Class B1 shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 1 June 2012. Returns shown here through October 2013 have been pro forma adjusted to account for a 2.0% management fee, a 20% incentive fee, and non trading expenses capped at 1%, in each case, as set forth in the Offering Memorandum. Class A1 shares of the Fund were first issued on 1 November 2013. From November 2013, forward, reported performance reflects actual Class A1 share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. The return figures shown are final values as calculated by the applicable fund administrator. Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
(28) The Polygon Distressed Opportunities Fund began trading on 2 September 2013. Returns shown are for offshore Class A shares, reflecting the terms set forth in the offering documents (2.0% management fee, 20% incentive fee and other items, in each case, as set forth in the offering documents) as calculated by the applicable fund administrator. Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
(29) The Polygon Global Equities Fund began trading with Class B/B1 shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 12 September 2011. Returns shown from inception through August 2013 have been pro forma adjusted to account for a 2.0% management fee and a 20% incentive fee, in each case, as to be set forth in further definitive documents. The fund began trading Class A shares, which are not new issue eligible, on 23 September 2011. Class A1 shares of the Fund, which are new issue eligible, were first issued on 1 November 2013, and returns from inception through October 2013 have been pro forma adjusted to match the Fund's Class A1 performance. AUM figure and net performance is as calculated by the applicable fund administrator. Past performance or experience (actual or simulated) does not necessarily give a guide for the future and no representation is being made that the funds listed will or are likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
(30) The Private Equity Vehicle noted is the Polygon Recovery Fund L.P. ("PRF"). The manager of the PRF is a subsidiary of TFG having been acquired in the Polygon transaction. The management fees earned in respect of PRF are included in the TFG Asset Management business segment described herein. PRF is a limited-life vehicle seeking to dispose of its portfolio securities prior to its initial term expiring in the first half of 2015 - with two additional one-year terms based on performance or investor approval. Individual investor performance will vary based on their high water mark. Currently the majority of Class C share class investors have not reached their high water mark, so their performance is the same as their gross performance. AUM figure and net performance is for PRF as calculated by the applicable fund administrator.
Financial Review
(31) Unrealised Polygon performance fees represent the fees calculated by the applicable administrator of the relevant Polygon funds, in accordance with the applicable fund constitutional documents, when determining net asset value at quarter end, less certain assumed costs. Similar amounts, if any, from LCM and GreenOak are excluded from this line item. Such fees would typically not be realised or recognised under U.S. GAAP until calendar year end, and are therefore subject to change based on fund performance during the remainder of the year. There are can be no assurance that the company will realise all or any portion of such amounts. Through 30 June 2014, this amount equalled $4.7 million before (1) an assumed imputed tax charge and (2) estimated TFM performance fees reduced the net contribution to $2.5 million as shown in Figure 11 and further represented in Figures 18 and 19 of this report. It also includes any unrealised performance fees to potentially be paid on investments made by TFG in Polygon hedge funds or other investment vehicles. TFG is able to invest at a preferred level of fees.
(32) Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share seeks to reflect certain potential changes to the total non- voting shares over the next few years, which may be utilised in the calculation of NAV per Share. Specifically, the number of shares used to calculate U.S. GAAP NAV per Share has been adjusted to incorporate:
(i) The Escrow Shares, which have been used as consideration for the acquisition of Polygon and applicable stock dividends relating thereto, and which are held in escrow and are expected to be released and incorporated into the U.S. GAAP NAV per Share over the next four years.
(ii) The number of shares corresponding to the applicable intrinsic value of the options issued to the Investment Manager at the time of the company's IPO with a strike price of $10.00, to the extent such options are in the money at period end. The intrinsic value of the manager (IPO) share options is calculated as the excess of (x) the closing price of the shares as of the final trading day in the relevant period over (y) $10.00 (being the exercise price per share) times (z) 12,545,330 (being a number of shares subject to the options before the application of potential anti-dilution). The terms of exercise under the options allow for exercise using cash, as well as, with the consent of the board of the company, certain forms of cashless exercise. Each of these prescribed methods of exercise may give rise to the issuance of a different number of shares than the approach described herein. If the options were to be surrendered for their intrinsic value with the board's consent, rather than exercised, the number of shares issued would equal the intrinsic value divided by the closing price of the shares as of the final trading day in the relevant period. This approach has been selected because we currently believe it is more reasonably illustrative of a likely outcome if the options are exercised. The options are exercisable until 26 April 2017.
Appendix IV
(33)Please see endnote 32.
An investment inTFGinvolves substantialrisks. Pleaserefertothecompany'swebsiteathttp://www.tetragoninv.comfor a description of the risks and uncertainties pertaining to an investment in TFG.
This release does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction. The securities of TFG have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to U.S. persons unless they are registered under applicable law or exempt from registration. TFG does not intend to register any portion of its securities in the United States or to conduct a public offer of securities in the United States. In addition, TFG has not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, and investors will not be entitled to the benefits of such Act. TFG isregistered in the publicregister of the Netherlands AuthorityfortheFinancial MarketsunderSection1:107oftheFMSAas a collective investment schemefrom adesignated country. This release constitutes regulated information ("gereglementeerde informative") within the meaning of Section 1:1 of the FMSA.
PRN NLD
