Anzeige
Mehr »
Login
Dienstag, 16.04.2024 Börsentäglich über 12.000 News von 689 internationalen Medien
Biotech-Perle kurz vor entscheidender Meilenstein-Meldung!
Anzeige

Indizes

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Aktien

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Xetra-Orderbuch

Fonds

Kurs

%

Devisen

Kurs

%

Rohstoffe

Kurs

%

Themen

Kurs

%

Erweiterte Suche
Dow Jones News
960 Leser
Artikel bewerten:
(2)

Polymetal: Q1 2022 production results and guidance update

DJ Polymetal: Q1 2022 production results and guidance update

Polymetal International plc (POLY) Polymetal: Q1 2022 production results and guidance update 25-Apr-2022 / 09:00 MSK Dissemination of a Regulatory Announcement, transmitted by EQS Group. The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release time IMMEDIATE                             LSE, MOEX, AIX: POLY / ADR: AUCOY 
Date     25 April 2022 Polymetal International plc Q1 2022 production results and guidance update 

Polymetal reports solid production results for the first quarter of 2022 and updated production and cost guidance.

"Devastating war in Ukraine and immense sanctions put tremendous pressure on Polymetal in Q1. The Company continues to operate safely and profitably and is fully focused on ensuring business continuity and long-term viability. It is with these objectives in mind that the Board was forced to postpone dividend decision and rationalize investment plans", said Vitaly Nesis, Group CEO of Polymetal. "The Board and management continue to actively explore options to adjust company asset ownership structure to preserve shareholder value and address the needs of other stakeholders".

HIGHLIGHTS

-- No fatal accidents occurred among Group workforce and contractors in Q1 2022. Lost time injury frequencyrate (LTIFR) among the Group's employees stood at 0.10, a 60% decrease over Q1 2021 as there were three incidentsrecorded (seven in Q1 2021) resulting in minor lost-time injuries.

-- The Company reconfirms its FY 2022 production guidance of 1.7 Moz GE (1.2 Moz in Russia, 0.5 Moz inKazakhstan).

-- Q1 gold equivalent production ("GE") decreased by 6% year-on-year (y-o-y) to 372 Koz as planned gradedecline at Albazino and Svetloye more than offset first material contribution from Nezhda. Sales were lower by 50Koz primarily due to concentrate inventory accumulation at Nezhda and Kyzyl.

-- Revenue for the quarter grew by 4% y-o-y to USUSD 616 million underpinned by higher gold prices and on theback of large historical sales/production gap in Q1 2021.

-- Net debt rose to roughly USUSD 2.0 billion on the back of higher working capital needs. The Company movedswiftly to increase stocks of critical consumables and spares to address supply chain issues related to sanctions.Seasonal concentrate inventory accumulation and the need to blend materials to comply with Chinese importrestrictions on arsenic also played a role.

-- The Company revises its Total cash cost (TCC) guidance to USUSD 850-950/GE oz (USUSD 950-1,050/GE oz inRussia and USUSD 700-800/oz in Kazakhstan) compared with the previous guidance range of USUSD 850-900/GE oz. AISCguidance is revised to USUSD 1,200-1,300/GE oz (USUSD 1,350-1,450/GE oz in Russia and USUSD 900-1,000/oz in Kazakhstan)compared with the previous guidance range of USUSD 1,100-1,200/ GE oz. Cost increases predominantly relate to variousimpacts of economic sanctions against Russia including domestic inflation, sharp escalation of logistical costs andthe need to shift to suboptimal supply sources.

-- POX-2 is likely to experience a 6-month slippage from the original schedule mostly due to supply chainchallenges and now is expected to start production in Q2 2024. All other major projects (Kutyn, Prognoz, Uralsflotation) are in the advanced stage of construction and will be continued according to the original plans.

-- Following a thorough project review, the Company suspended indefinitely its Pacific POX project and iscurrently evaluating options to re-site the facility in Kazakhstan. Commencement of Veduga construction as well asa number of other smaller scale projects have also been delayed by 12-18 months. CAPEX guidance for the full-year2022 is therefore revised to USUSD 650 million (USUSD 580 million in Russia and USUSD 70 million in Kazakhstan)reflecting both shrinking investment scope and inflationary pressures.

-- Medium-term production guidance now stands at: 1.65 Moz for 2023, 1.7 Moz for 2024, 1.7 Moz for 2025, 1.8Moz for 2026.

-- The decision on 2021 final dividend was postponed until August 2022 as reported earlier.

-- The Company will host its virtual Analyst & Investor Day today at 11:00 London time (13:00 Moscow time).Please follow the link to join https://www.webcast-eqs.com/polymetal20220425.

OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                             % change1 
                 2022    2021 
 
Waste mined, Mt         55.0    45.4    +21% 
Underground development, km   23.9    23.0    +4% 
Ore mined, Mt          4.3     3.8     +14% 
Open-pit             3.3     2.8     +18% 
Underground           1.0     1.0     +4% 
Ore processed, Mt        4.1     3.6     +13% 
Average GE grade processed, g/t 3.5     4.0     -13% 
Production 
Gold, Koz            315     337     -6% 
Silver, Moz           4.5     4.6     -2% 
Gold equivalent, Koz2      372     394     -6% 
Sales 
Gold, Koz            268     280     -4% 
Silver, Moz           4.4     3.7     +17% 
Revenue, USUSDm3          616     593     +4% 
Net debt, USUSDm4         1,978    1,647    +20% 
Safety 
  LTIFR (Employees)5      0.10    0.25    -60% 
  Fatalities          0      0      NA 

Notes: (1) % changes can be different from zero even when absolute numbers are unchanged because of rounding. Likewise, % changes can be equal to zero when absolute numbers differ due to the same reason. This note applies to all tables in this release.

(2) Based on 80:1 Au/Ag conversion ratio and excluding base metals. Comparative data for 2021 restated accordingly (120:1 Au/Ag conversion ratio was used previously).

(3) Calculated based on the unaudited consolidated management accounts.

(4) Non-IFRS measure based on unaudited consolidated management accounts. Comparative information is presented for 31 December 2021.

(5) LTIFR = lost time injury frequency rate per 200,000 hours worked.

PRODUCTION BY MINE

3 months ended Mar 31, % 
         2022    2021    change 
GOLD EQ. (KOZ)1 
Kyzyl      82     89     -8% 
Dukat      66     66     -1% 
Varvara     57     60     -4% 
Albazino     56     77     -27% 
Omolon      40     47     -16% 
Nezhda      30     -      NA 
Voro       20     22     -10% 
Svetloye     19     27     -30% 
Mayskoye     3      6      -55% 
TOTAL      372     394     -6% 

Notes: (1) Based on 80:1 Au/Ag conversion ratio and excluding base metals. Comparative data for 2021 restated accordingly 120:1 Au/Ag conversion ratio was used).

CONFERENCE CALL AND WEBCAST

The management will discuss Q1 production results during the Analyst & Investor Day today at 11:00 London time (13:00 Moscow time). Please follow the link to join https://www.webcast-eqs.com/polymetal20220425.

Enquiries

Investor Relations 
Polymetal    ir@polymetalinternational.com 
Evgeny Monakhov +44 20 7887 1475 (UK) 
Timofey Kulakov 
Kirill Kuznetsov +7 812 334 3666 (Russia) 

Forward-looking statements

DUE TO THE RECENT MASSIVE DDOS ATTACKS, OUR WEBSITE MAY BE TEMPORARILY UNAVAILABLE, THOUGH WE WILL CONTINUE DISTRIBUTION AND PUBLISHING ALL OUR ANNOUNCEMENTS THERE. THEY WILL BE FULLY AVAILABLE WHEN THE SITE RETURNS TO NORMAL OPERATION.

This release may include statements that are, or may be deemed to be, "forward-looking statements". These forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this release. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the words "targets", "believes", "expects", "aims", "intends", "will", "may", "anticipates", "would", "could" or "should" or similar expressions or, in each case their negative or other variations or by discussion of strategies, plans, objectives, goals, future events or intentions. These forward-looking statements all include matters that are not historical facts. By their nature, such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors beyond the company's control that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions regarding the company's present and future business strategies and the environment in which the company will operate in the future. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. There are many factors that could cause the company's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. The company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the company's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based.

KYZYL

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                          % change 
              2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt      20.7    20.2    +2% 
Ore mined (open-pit), Kt  584     556     +5% 
 
PROCESSING 
Ore processed, Kt     551     563     -2% 
Gold grade, g/t      4.8     6.0     -20% 
Gold recovery       87.7%    88.8%    -1% 
Gold in concentrate, Koz1 73     96     -24% 
 
Concentrate shipped, Kt  10.8    27.0    -60% 
Payable gold shipped, Koz 20     46     -57% 
 
Amursk POX 
Concentrate processed, Kt 14     12     +13% 
Gold recovery       94.6%    92.4%    +2% 
Gold produced, Koz     62     43     +44% 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz         82     89     -8% 

Note: (1) For information only; not considered as gold produced and therefore not reflected in the table representing total production. It will be included in total production upon shipment to off-taker or dore production at Amursk POX.

(2) To be further processed at Amursk POX.

In Q1, gold production at Kyzyl contracted by 8% as the mining was focused on the eastern part of the pit with lower grade (where historical underground workings are located), and due to concentrate stockpiling to form batches with sufficiently low arsenic content to be shipped to China. The inventory is expected to be drawn down in the following quarters.

DUKAT OPERATIONS

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                           % change 
               2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt       0.9     0.4     +122% 
Underground development, km 11.6    11.7    -1% 
Ore mined, Kt        633     645     -2% 
  Open-pit         107     104     +3% 
  Underground       527     542     -3% 
 
PROCESSING 
Omsukchan concentrator 
Ore processed, Kt      515     513     +1% 
Grade 
Gold, g/t          0.7     0.5     +42% 
Silver, g/t         249     252     -1% 
Recovery1 
Gold             83.7%    83.2%    +1% 
Silver            84.9%    86.8%    -2% 
Production 
Gold, Koz          9      6      +42% 
Silver, Moz         3.4     3.5     -4% 
 
Lunnoye plant 
Ore processed, Kt      115     116     -0% 
Grade 
Gold, g/t          1.9     1.5     +28% 
Silver, g/t         185     252     -27% 
Recovery1 
Gold             91.5%    91.7%    -0% 
Silver            92.7%    92.2%    +1% 
Production 
Gold, Koz          6      5      +26% 
Silver, Moz         0.7     0.9     -24% 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz          15     11     +35% 
Silver, Moz         4.0     4.4     -8% 

Notes: (1) Technological recovery, includes gold and silver within work-in-progress inventory.

Dukat Q1 gold production was above the plan as the Company reached high-grade ore blocks at the Dukat mine. Silver output was lower in line with the budget.

At Primorskoye, the Company will be stockpiling ore to ship it by sea to customers during the navigation period in H2 2022.

Waste mined jumped y-o-y due to mining of crown pillar at the Dukat open pit.

VARVARA

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                            % change 
                2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt         11.0    9.5     +16% 
Ore mined, Kt          957     1,056    -9% 
 
PROCESSING 
Leaching 
Ore processed, Kt        769     764     +1% 
Gold grade, g/t         1.7     1.7     +1% 
Gold recovery1         89.6%    86.4%    +4% 
Gold production (in dore), Koz 45     46     -2% 
 
Flotation 
Ore processed, Kt        179     190     -6% 
Gold grade, g/t         2.8     2.5     +12% 
Recovery1            88.5%    84.6%    +5% 
Gold in concentrate, Koz    11     13     -14% 
 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz            57     60     -4% 

Note: (1) Technological recovery, includes gold and copper within work-in-progress inventory. Does not include toll-treated ore.

At Varvara, gold recovery at the leaching circuit improved by 4 p.p. y-o-y following flowsheet improvements. At the flotation plant, grade and recoveries increased driven by larger volumes and better quality of third-party ore.

Mine's gold production contracted y-o-y on the back of high base of Q1 2021 when significant work-in-progress was released.

ALBAZINO

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                           % change 
               2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt       7.2     5.1     +41% 
Underground development, km 4.6     3.3     +40% 
Ore mined, Kt        772     495     +56% 
Open-pit           569     308     +85% 
Underground         203     187     +9% 
 
PROCESSING 
Albazino concentrator 
Ore processed, Kt      453     427     +6% 
Gold grade, g/t       3.2     4.3     -25% 
Gold recovery1        86.7%    88.7%    -2% 
Gold in concentrate, Koz2  41     52     -22% 
 
Amursk POX 
Concentrate processed, Kt  43.2    48.3    -11% 
Gold grade, g/t       44.3    52.8    -16% 
Gold recovery        96.5%    96.5%    -0% 
Gold produced, Koz      56     77     -28% 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz          56     77     -28% 

Notes: (1) To concentrate.

(2) For information only; not considered as gold produced and therefore not reflected in the table representing total production. Included in total production after Dore production at the Amursk POX.

At Albazino, production decreased by 28% y-o-y on the back of depletion of high-grade Anfisa pit as well as negative recovery rate dynamics attributable to the increase of share of oxidised ore from Ekaterina mine.

Waste and ore mining volumes were higher driven by Kutyn and Farida development. Underground development advanced due to ramping-up of Ekaterina and Anfisa underground mines.

Kutyn construction progressed on schedule, the project is 80% completed. The Company expects heap leaching to start-up in Q3 2022.

AMURSK POX

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                          % change 
              2022    2021 
Concentrate processed, Kt 58     60     -4% 
 Albazino         43     44     -2% 
 Kyzyl          14     12     +13% 
 Nezhda          1      0      NA 
 Mayskoye         0      0      +1% 
 Veduga          0      4      -100% 
 
Gold recovery       95.5%    94.9%    +1% 
Average gold grade, g/t  64.9    69.6    -7% 
 
Total gold produced2, Koz 120     121     -1% 
 Albazino         56     67     -17% 
 Kyzyl          62     43     +44% 
 Mayskoye         2      1      +61% 
 Veduga          -      9      -100% 
 Nezhda          1      -      NA 

Notes: (1) Purchased concentrates which are included in reportable production in the Albazino segment.

(2) For information only. Already accounted for in production at operating mines.

POX production was stable. The plant processed the first test batch of Nezhda's gold flotation concentrate demonstrating sufficient recoveries. OMOLON OPERATIONS

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                           % change 
               2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt       1.8     0.3     +466% 
Underground development, Km 3.0     2.7     +13% 
Ore mined, Kt        104     73     +43% 
  Open-pit         -      -      NA 
  Underground       104     73     +43% 
 
PROCESSING 
Kubaka Mill 
Ore processed, Kt      212     212     +0% 
Grade 
Gold, g/t          5.8     6.9     -16% 
Silver, g/t         24     23     +5% 
Recovery1 
Gold             92.9%    92.8%    +0% 
Silver            75.8%    77.8%    -3% 
Gold production, Koz     37     45     -18% 
Silver production, Moz    0.1     0.1     -3% 
 
Birkachan Heap Leach 
Ore stacked, Kt       -      45     -100% 
Gold grade, g/t       -      1.0     -100% 
Gold production, Koz     1      1      +146% 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz          38     45     -16% 
Silver, Moz         0.1     0.1     -1% 

Note: (1) Technological recovery, includes gold and silver within work-in-progress inventory.

Gold production at Omolon decreased by 16% y-o-y on the back of the planned decline in grade processed.

Waste mine jumped as the development of Burgali open pit progressed, while ore mining there will recommence in Q3 2022. Underground ore mining was higher due to above-the-budget associated ore volumes.

NEZHDA

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                             % change 
                 2022     2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt         4.9      5.3    -7% 
Ore mined, Kt          604      346    +75% 
 
PROCESSING 
Ore processed, Kt        484      -     NA 
Grade 
Gold, g/t            3.7      -     NA 
Silver, g/t           30.5     -     NA 
Recovery1 
Gold               73.2%     -     NA 
Silver              74.7%     -     NA 
Gold in concentrate, Koz     42      -     NA 
Silver in concentrate, Moz    0.4      -     NA 
 
Concentrate shipped, Kt     1.1      -     NA 
Payable gold in concentrate, Koz 26      -     NA 
 
Amursk POX 
Concentrate processed, Kt    1.1      -     NA 
Gold grade, g/t         39.6     -     NA 
Gold recovery          88.1%     -     NA 
Gold produced, Koz        1       -     NA 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz            27      -     NA 
Silver, Moz           0.2      -     NA 

At Nezhda, first concentrate was shipped to off-takers. The concentrator achieved design throughput on planned grade. Recovery remained lower than design by 3-4 percentage points as the Company targeted higher improved market liquidity for its products against the backdrop of further tightening in Chinese arsenic restrictions

VORO

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                       % change 
           2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt    3.4     0.6     +481% 
Ore mined, Kt     76     11     +570% 
 
PROCESSING 
CIP 
Ore processed, Kt   246     260     -5% 
Gold grade, g/t    2.1     2.2     -3% 
Gold recovery1    85.7%    83.9%    +2% 
Gold production, Koz 18     20     -8% 
 
Heap Leach 
Ore stacked, Kt    -      -      NA 
Gold grade, g/t    -      -      NA 
Gold production, Koz 1      2      -69% 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz       19     22     -11% 

Note: (1) Technological recovery, includes gold within work-in-progress inventory.

At Voro, quarterly gold production contracted due to lower volumes of third-party and Pesherny feedstocks as well as a decrease in volumes processed.

Voro flotation plant construction is 70% completed. Start-up is targeted for Q1 2023

SVETLOYE

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                         % change 
             2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt      1.6     0.7     +144% 
Ore mined (open pit), Kt 369     390     -5% 
 
PROCESSING 
Ore stacked, Kt      312     282     +11% 
Gold grade, g/t      1.9     4.8     -61% 
Gold recovery       80.8%    82.1%    -2% 
Gold production, Koz   19     27     -30% 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz         19     27     -30% 

Gold production at Svetloye recorded a 30% y-o-y decrease on the back of stacking of stockpiled low-grade ore from depleted Lyudmila main pit. Full-year grade is expected to normalize.

Waste mined increase is attributable to development of a new pit at Lyudmila (Nadezhda - launched in 2021), new pushback (Stage 3) at the Emmy pit.

MAYSKOYE

3 months ended Mar 31, 
                                     % change 
                         2022    2021 
MINING 
Waste mined, Mt                  1.0     0.9     +8% 
Underground development, km            4.7     5.1     -7% 
Ore mined, Kt                   195     191     +2% 
Open-pit                     13     13     -1% 
Underground                    183     178     +3% 
 
PROCESSING 
Ore processed, Kt                 230     217     +6% 
Gold grade, g/t                  5.6     6.2     -9% 
Gold recovery1                  90.8%    92.5%    -2% 
Gold in concentrate, Koz2             38     40     -6% 
 
Amursk POX 
Gold produced in dore from concentrate (POX), Koz 2      1      +61% 
Gold produced in dore from carbon, Koz3      1      5      -76% 
 
TOTAL PRODUCTION 
Gold, Koz                     3      6      -55% 

Notes: (1) To concentrate.

(2) For information only; not considered as gold produced and therefore not reflected in the table representing total production. Included in total production upon sale to off-taker or dore production at Amursk POX.

(3) Gold produced from carbon at Amursk POX.

Gold in concentrate production at Mayskoye decreased on the back the planned grade decline. Full-year average grade is expected to be roughly stable y-o-y.

Mayskoye haulage project (ore transportation by conveyor) is on track for launch in Q3 2022. Paste backfill plant construction is postponed by one year due to supply chain challenges.

POX-2

At POX-2, construction of metal frameworks at the autoclave servicing area and slurry cooling section as well as sandwich panels' construction at the high bay area is in progress. Concentrate preparation equipment and vessels at slurry mixing neutralization areas are being installed. Thickener installation is ongoing. Foundation works for the CIL equipment and preparation for technological pipelines installation at the downstream section are in progress. Construction of 16 MW boiler house completed.

POX-2 is likely to experience a 6 month slippage from the original schedule mostly due to supply chain challenges and now is expected to fully ramp-up in Q2 2024.

SUSTAINABILITY, HEALTH AND SAFETY

No fatal accidents occurred among Group employees and contractors in Q1 2022 (none did in Q1 2021). Group's lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) decreased by 60% y-o-y to 0.10 (0.25 in Q1 2021). Three incidents resulting in lost time injuries occurred among Group employees and another three - among contractors, with all of the injuries classified as minor. Each incident was followed by proper investigations aimed at improving safety of workplaces.

In Q1, Polymetal published its Sustainability Performance Data 2021 (GRI and SASB) and climate report in accordance with TCFD, which accompanied the Integrated Annual Report 2021 for the year ended 31 December 2021.

Following the recent geopolitical developments, Sustainalytics has increased Polymetal's ESG Risk Rating from 15.9 (Low Risk) to 21.9 (Medium Risk), while MSCI ESG Ratings has downgraded Polymetal's ESG Rating from AA to B.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ISIN:      JE00B6T5S470 
Category Code: MSCH 
TIDM:      POLY 
LEI Code:    213800JKJ5HJWYS4GR61 
OAM Categories: 3.1. Additional regulated information required to be disclosed under the laws of a Member State 
Sequence No.:  157149 
EQS News ID:  1333649 
 
End of Announcement EQS News Service 
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Image link: https://eqs-cockpit.com/cgi-bin/fncls.ssp?fn=show_t_gif&application_id=1333649&application_name=news

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 25, 2022 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)

Großer Insider-Report 2024 von Dr. Dennis Riedl
Wenn Insider handeln, sollten Sie aufmerksam werden. In diesem kostenlosen Report erfahren Sie, welche Aktien Sie im Moment im Blick behalten und von welchen Sie lieber die Finger lassen sollten.
Hier klicken
© 2022 Dow Jones News
Werbehinweise: Die Billigung des Basisprospekts durch die BaFin ist nicht als ihre Befürwortung der angebotenen Wertpapiere zu verstehen. Wir empfehlen Interessenten und potenziellen Anlegern den Basisprospekt und die Endgültigen Bedingungen zu lesen, bevor sie eine Anlageentscheidung treffen, um sich möglichst umfassend zu informieren, insbesondere über die potenziellen Risiken und Chancen des Wertpapiers. Sie sind im Begriff, ein Produkt zu erwerben, das nicht einfach ist und schwer zu verstehen sein kann.