Anzeige
Mehr »
Login
Dienstag, 30.04.2024 Börsentäglich über 12.000 News von 686 internationalen Medien
Basin Uranium: Es geht los! Der Uran-Superzyklus ist gestartet!
Anzeige

Indizes

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Aktien

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Xetra-Orderbuch

Fonds

Kurs

%

Devisen

Kurs

%

Rohstoffe

Kurs

%

Themen

Kurs

%

Erweiterte Suche
PR Newswire
14 Leser
Artikel bewerten:
(0)

Shareholder Class Action Filed Against MF Global Ltd. by the Law Firm of Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP

RADNOR, Pa., April 4, 2008 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement was issued today by the law firm of Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP:

Notice is hereby given that a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of all who purchased or otherwise acquired common stock pursuant or traceable to MF Global Ltd.'s ("MF" or the "Company") Initial Public Offering ("IPO" or the "Offering") on or about July 19, 2007.

If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP (Darren J. Check, Esq. or Richard A. Maniskas, Esq.) toll free at 1-888-299-7706 or 1-610-667-7706, or via e-mail at info@sbtklaw.com.

The Complaint charges MF and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Act of 1933. MF is a broker of exchange-listed futures and options. It provides execution and clearing services for exchange-traded and over-the-counter derivative products as well as for non- derivative foreign exchange products and securities in the cash market.

The Complaint alleges that, in connection with the Company's IPO, defendants failed to disclose or indicate the following: (1) that the Company lacked adequate risk management systems; (2) specifically, that the Company's order-entry systems were not operating in an efficient manner such that they were deemed ineffective; and (3) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls.

Since the time of its IPO, MF represented to investors and financial analysts that it had extensive and sufficient risk management procedures and internal controls. On February 28, 2008, however, the Company shocked investors when it announced that it would incur a $141.5 million loss as a result of unauthorized trades by one of its traders, later identified as Evan "Brent" Dooley. The Company admitted that a failure in one of its retail order entry systems permitted the rogue trader to establish significant positions in his own account which were liquidated later that morning. The following day, it was reported in The Wall Street Journal that the internal controls of the Company's systems were sometimes turned off at the Memphis office and possibly other locations in order to speed trades.

In response to this news, shares of the Company's stock declined $8.09 per share, or 27.63 percent, to close on February 28, 2008 at $21.19 per share, on unusually heavy trading volume. The Company's shares continued to fall the following day, declining an additional $3.64 per share, or 17.18 percent, to close on February 29, 2008 at $17.55 per share. This closing price represented a cumulative loss of $12.45, or over 41 percent, of the value of the Company's shares at the time of its IPO just months prior.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of class members and is represented by the law firm of Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler which prosecutes class actions in both state and federal courts throughout the country. Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler is a driving force behind corporate governance reform, and has recovered billions of dollars on behalf of institutional and individual investors from the United States and around the world.

For more information about Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler or to sign up to participate in this action online, please visit http://www.sbtklaw.com/

If you are a member of the class described above, you may, not later than May 9, 2008, move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff of the class, if you so choose. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. Any member of the purported class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

CONTACT: Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP Darren J. Check, Esq. Richard A. Maniskas, Esq. 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA 19087 1-888-299-7706 (toll free) or 1-610-667-7706 Or by e-mail at info@sbtklaw.com

Großer Insider-Report 2024 von Dr. Dennis Riedl
Wenn Insider handeln, sollten Sie aufmerksam werden. In diesem kostenlosen Report erfahren Sie, welche Aktien Sie im Moment im Blick behalten und von welchen Sie lieber die Finger lassen sollten.
Hier klicken
© 2008 PR Newswire
Werbehinweise: Die Billigung des Basisprospekts durch die BaFin ist nicht als ihre Befürwortung der angebotenen Wertpapiere zu verstehen. Wir empfehlen Interessenten und potenziellen Anlegern den Basisprospekt und die Endgültigen Bedingungen zu lesen, bevor sie eine Anlageentscheidung treffen, um sich möglichst umfassend zu informieren, insbesondere über die potenziellen Risiken und Chancen des Wertpapiers. Sie sind im Begriff, ein Produkt zu erwerben, das nicht einfach ist und schwer zu verstehen sein kann.