Fitch Ratings assigns an 'AA' rating to the following general obligation (GO) bonds of the State of Connecticut:
--$518 million GO refunding bonds (2012 series C).
The bonds are expected to sell via negotiated sale on June 12, 2012.
In addition, Fitch affirms the following outstanding ratings:
--Approximately $13.5 billion GO bonds and notes at 'AA'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
SECURITY
GO bonds to which the full faith and credit of the state will be pledged for payment of principal and interest.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
--HIGH WEALTH LEVELS: Connecticut is the nation's wealthiest state as measured by per capita personal income. Economic performance has stabilized following the recession, but the recovery has been slow and uneven.
--CONSERVATIVE FORECASTING: State finances are marked by conservatively forecast, though cyclical, revenue performance and persistent spending pressure, including for labor and Medicaid.
--SLOW RECOVERY DELAYING FISCAL IMPROVEMENT: The slow, uneven economic recovery is delaying the state's ability to recover quickly from the recession. The state's past practice has been to use revenue recovery to repay recessionary budget borrowing rapidly and rebuild rainy day balances.
--HIGH DEBT: Tax-supported debt is high for a U.S. state. Most GO bonds, excluding GO bonds issued to fund the teachers' retirement system, amortize rapidly.
--SIGNIFICANT PENSION OBLIGATIONS: Unfunded liabilities for employees are significant, including for state employee and teacher pensions.
CREDIT PROFILE
The state's 'AA' GO rating reflects its vast wealth and income resources, tempered by a relatively high burden of debt and retirement liabilities. The slow and uneven pace of the economic recovery is affecting the pace of revenue growth and the state's ability to quickly recover from the downturn.
The enacted budget for the fiscal 2012-2013 biennium, which began July 1, 2011, implemented various recurring solutions, including tax rate increases, spending cuts and labor savings to achieve balance, a notable departure from recent biennial budgets that had relied largely on one-time resources. Revenue underperformance since budget adoption has been offset by prompt state balancing action, although the previously sizable projected ending balance anticipated as of June 30, 2013 has been eliminated.
Connecticut has a wealthy, diverse economy anchored by a large finance sector and important manufacturing, education and health sectors. The state entered the recession later than the U.S. as a whole, with employment growth stalling in 2008 before falling 4.3% in 2009 and 1.1% in 2010. Growth resumed in late 2010, although economic performance has been mixed since then. Employment rose 1% in 2011, and April 2012 employment rose 0.1% over April 2011, well below the 1.3% growth rate recorded nationally. Unemployment has fallen, to 7.7% in April 2012, compared to a 9% rate reported one year earlier. The state remains the wealthiest as measured by personal income per capita, at 137% of the national average in 2011. After falling sharply in the recession, personal income is rebounding, with the fourth quarter 2011 up 4.7% year-over-year.
The state has a history of conservative revenue forecasting and accumulating excess revenues in its budget reserve fund (BRF). Prior to the onset of the recession, the BRF balance had risen to $1.38 billion in fiscal 2007, equal to 8.5% of appropriations; the statutory maximum is 10%. The balance was fully drawn in the fiscal 2010-2011 biennium. Fiscal performance was strained through the last recession, with the state relying on non-recurring resources to close persistent budgetary gaps, including use of BRF balances, federal stimulus funds and borrowing $916 million in GO economic recovery notes (ERNs).
The enacted budget for the fiscal 2012-2013 biennium anticipated modest revenue recovery, with surpluses directed toward repayment of ERNs and transitioning the state to GAAP budgeting. The adopted budget closed gaps of approximately $3 billion in each year, equivalent to 19.3% and 17% of baseline projected revenues, respectively. Projected gaps were addressed primarily through recurring actions, including new tax revenues ($1.5 billion annually), labor concessions ($1.6 billion through the biennium), and spending cuts ($758 million).
The slow pace of economic recovery and persistent spending needs have weighed on state performance through fiscal 2012, eroding a fiscal year-end balance originally forecast at $80.9 million. Fiscal 2012 revenues are now estimated to fall short of the original budget estimate by $243 million, largely due to lagging personal income tax receipts partly offset by strength in sales and oil company taxes. Combined with additional spending needs, largely for social services, the state has had to address a fiscal 2012 gap of $276 million. State actions to close the gap include mid-year spending cuts ($78.7 million) announced in February 2012 and a prior year surplus transfer ($197.5 million) that was originally intended for early repayment of the ERNs.
The state also made various mid-biennium adjustments to the fiscal 2013 budget, including additional funds for K-12 schools ($93.8 million) and increasing the state's pension contribution ($123 million, of which $85 million is from the general fund), offset by savings in Medicaid and other programs. Including the impact of weaker revenue trends and mid-biennium adjustments, the fiscal 2013 year-end balance is now forecast at $500,000, down from $438.5 million when the biennium budget was adopted. The state continues to expect to transition to GAAP-based budgeting in fiscal 2014.
The state's fixed debt burden is high compared to other states, with net tax-supported debt as of February 2012 at almost $18.2 billion, or 8.9% of 2011 preliminary personal income. Three-quarters of net tax-supported debt is GO, a large share of which is issued for local school capital needs. Excluding $2.3 billion in GO pension bonds issued for the teachers' retirement fund (TRF), the debt burden falls to a still high 7.8% of personal income.
Funding levels for the state's major pension systems remain a concern. As of June 30, 2011, the state employees' retirement system (SERS) was funded at 47.9%, and the TRF was funded at 61.4%, with the latter having benefited from the 2008 issuance of pension bonds. Using Fitch's more conservative 7% investment return assumption (instead of the 8.25% rate assumed by SERS and the 8.5% rate assumed by TRF) reduces funding levels to 42.1% and 52.7%, respectively.
On a combined basis, the burden of net tax-supported debt and adjusted unfunded pension obligations equals 22.1% of 2011 preliminary personal income, well above the 6.6% median for U.S. states rated by Fitch. The state fully funds an actuarially required contribution (ARC) to TRF under a covenant linked to the POBs, and the SERS ARC is again fully funded in the budget. The governor's mid-biennium budget revision adjusted the state's contributions to SERS to accelerate improvements to the funded ratio.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been compensated for the provision of the ratings.
In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's Tax-Supported Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from IHS Global Insight.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 15, 2011);
--'U.S. State Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 15, 2011).
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=648898
U.S. State Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=648897
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE.
Contacts:
Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Douglas Offerman, +1-212-908-0889
Senior
Director
Fitch Inc., 1 State Street Plaza, New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary
Analyst
Marcy Block, +1-212-908-0239
Senior Director
or
Committee
Chairperson
Laura Porter, +1-212-908-0575
Managing Director
or
Media
Relations:
Elizabeth Fogerty, +1-212-908-0526
Email: elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com