Anzeige
Mehr »
Mittwoch, 02.07.2025 - Börsentäglich über 12.000 News
Nach dem Genius Act: Dieses börsennotierte XRP-Unternehmen greift im Token-Finanzmarkt an!
Anzeige

Indizes

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Aktien

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Xetra-Orderbuch

Fonds

Kurs

%

Devisen

Kurs

%

Rohstoffe

Kurs

%

Themen

Kurs

%

Erweiterte Suche
Dow Jones News
412 Leser
Artikel bewerten:
(0)

TILP Press Release: Billion euro lawsuit against Deutsche Bank AG based on alleged fraud

Dow Jones received a payment from EQS/DGAP to publish this press release.

DGAP-Media / 2019-01-22 / 06:30 
 
*Press Release* 
 
11 billion euro lawsuit before the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court against 
Deutsche Bank AG and Hauck & Aufhäuser Privatbankiers AG for fraud - 
criminal charges brought against Deutsche Bank AG and Hauck & Aufhäuser 
Privatbankiers AG to the Stuttgart state prosecutor. 
 
_Frankfurt am Main/Kirchentellinsfurt, January 22, 2019_ 
 
TILP Litigation Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (TILP Litigation) has filed a 
lawsuit before the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court on behalf of 
Stuttgart-based businessman Hafez Sabet against Deutsche Bank AG and Hauck & 
Aufhäuser Privatbankiers AG as joint and several debtors for more than 11 
billion euros. The complaint with docket number 2-05 O 440/18 has been 
effectively served on the defendants. The plaintiff accuses the two banks of 
having manipulated a property transaction in 2013 and having colluded to his 
detriment by means of intentional immoral acts. This would have allegedly 
enabled Deutsche Bank AG to commit fraud in a prior lawsuit that had been 
brought against Deutsche Bank AG by Hafez Sabet in Stuttgart and therefore 
led to damages that are now brought by Mr. Sabet before the Frankfurt 
Regional Court. 
 
*Background: The initial court proceedings in Stuttgart* 
 
In 2009 Mr. Sabet filed a claim for damages in Stuttgart against Deutsche 
Bank AG (Deutsche Bank) in connection with the insolvency proceedings opened 
in 2004 concerning the assets of the company M. Sabet & Sons (Sabet 
company), which was at that time the world's largest dealer of oriental 
carpets and operated an engine development institute. The main issue in the 
lawsuit was the question of whether Deutsche Bank was overcollateralized 
with Sabet company assets and thus unlawfully brought about insolvency. The 
lawsuit with a claim amount of around 5.9 billion euros plus statutory 
default interest was lost in 2015. About 5.6 billion euros of the Stuttgart 
claim were, according to an expert's report documenting damages, caused by 
the shutdown of the "Sabet-Motor" engine institute. "This engine, whose 
success has been proven both in the testing of the institute and in expert 
reports, was already well-developed at the time of the Sabet company 
insolvency, which has affected all Sabet family assets, thus preventing the 
completion of the engine development," explains lawyer Andreas W. Tilp, 
managing director of the TILP Litigation the billion euro damages. Tilp has 
previously represented Mr. Sabet in the initial proceedings in Stuttgart. 
 
For the first time, in 2018, Mr. Sabet received documents which provide 
evidence of the allegations of fraud, and as a result, represented by the 
renowned Cologne criminal law firm Gercke Wollschläger, brought criminal 
charges in May of 2018, inter alia against those responsible from Deutsche 
Bank AG as well as the Hauck & Aufhäuser Privatbankiers AG (Hauck & 
Aufhäuser), which are being processed by the state prosecutor's office 
Stuttgart under docket number 145 Js 50442/18. "In our legal opinion, 
Deutsche Bank only won the then ongoing Stuttgart lawsuit because it 
committed fraud there, made possible by Hauck & Aufhäuser," says Tilp. "We 
are confident that we will be able to prove that this fraud was committed 
before the court, based on the documents that we received in 2018," 
continues Tilp. 
 
*The alleged fraud before the court in Stuttgart* 
 
Mr. Sabet substantiates his allegation of fraud before the court with the 
fact that Deutsche Bank as defendant in the initial Stuttgart lawsuit 
claimed, against its better knowledge, a low collateral value on two Sabet 
properties located in Stuttgart Pragsattel (Maybachstraße and 
Rheinstahlstraße). The value of these plots, however, played a key role 
in the legal proceedings with regard to the controversial question of 
overcollateralization. "According to our analysis, there was a clear 
overcollateralization and Deutsche Bank would have had to release 
collaterals to Sabet company by the year 2002 at the latest, therefore 
avoiding its bankruptcy", explains lawyer Tilp. "Instead of releasing 
collaterals, however, Deutsche Bank terminated the loans for its 
decades-long client M. Sabet & Sons and filed for bankruptcy." 
 
The Sabet properties on the Pragsattel were to be acquired by TD Trump 
Deutschland AG in 2001, with the intention of building the "Trump Tower". 
According to the complaint the final sale failed because Deutsche Bank 
refused to release the land charge registered in its favor. "In our legal 
opinion, this refusal was unlawful and led to the bankruptcy of the Sabet 
company, which is why we have sued on behalf of Mr. Sabet before the 
Stuttgart Regional and the Higher Regional Court for damages for breach of 
contract and intentional immoral injury," says Tilp. 
 
For the Higher Regional Court Stuttgart, the important issue in terms of the 
overcollateralization was the valuation of the Sabet properties on 
Pragsattel, which were sold as part of the bankruptcy estate during the 
Stuttgart proceedings. "In 2013 Deutsche Bank hence had a fundamental 
interest in the fact that these Sabet properties would be sold out of the 
bankruptcy estate for a value far lower than its actual value," says Tilp. 
 
In August of 2013 the sale of the Pragsattel properties to the project 
companies Maybach 1-4 GmbH & Co. KG (Maybach 1-4) took place at a price of 
6.7 million euros. In its judgement (docket number 9 U 157/13) against Mr. 
Sabet in May of 2014, the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court stated that this 
sale price proved a low collateral value of the Pragsattel properties in the 
bankruptcy as a whole and denied an overcollateralisation of Deutsche Bank. 
 
In just five weeks after the final acquisition of ownership, the properties 
were resold by Maybach 1-4 for a minimum purchase price of 16 million euros. 
 
"It is our legal conviction that the Pragsattel plots were sold far below 
their value and therefore dumped in order to fight off the Stuttgart lawsuit 
of our client Hafez Sabet and damaging the insolvency assets. This 
dissipation happened, according to our recent findings, with knowledge and 
intent of the insolvency administrator Steffen Beck, today managing director 
of Pluta Rechtsanwalts GmbH, as well as of Hauck & Aufhäuser and Deutsche 
Bank", states Tilp. "According to the documents which we have recently 
received, Hauck & Aufhäuser had connected with the purchaser Maybach 1-4 by 
means of a trustee structure for their mutual benefit and also secured the 
real estate purchase," continues Tilp. 
 
*Summary* 
 
The summary of attorney Tilp is as follows: "Deutsche Bank has, according to 
our legal opinion, criminally colluded with Hauck & Aufhäuser by 
manipulating the real estate purchase prices to be lowered, and conducted 
itself deceitfully in the initial court proceedings before the Stuttgart 
Higher Regional Court, thereby winning those proceedings. We are confident 
that this alleged fraud will now be found by the Frankfurt Regional Court." 
 
*Contact* 
TILP Litigation Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH 
Andreas W. Tilp | Rechtsanwalt 
Einhornstraße 21 
D-72138 Kirchentellinsfurt 
Telefon: + 49-7121-90909-0 
Telefax: +49-7121-90909-81 
E-Mail: medien@tilp.de 
www.tilp.de [1] 
TILP Litigation Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (TILP LITIGATION) is a sister 
law firm of TILP Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (TILP) and specializes in 
litigation, primarily for institutional investors in the field of capital 
markets law. TILP LITIGATION represents lead plaintiffs in billion euro 
investor lawsuits under the German Capital Markets Model Case Act, such as 
currently in the matter of the Porsche/Volkswagen takeover attempt of 2008 
before the Higher Regional Court of Celle and aggrieved investors in the 
matter of "Dieselgate" before the Higher Regional Court of Brunswick. 
 
End of Media Release 
 
Issuer: TILP Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH 
 
2019-01-22 Dissemination of a Press Release, transmitted by DGAP - a service 
of EQS Group AG. 
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement. 
 
The DGAP Distribution Services include Regulatory Announcements, 
Financial/Corporate News and Press Releases. 
Archive at www.dgap.de 
768227 2019-01-22 
 
 
1: https://link.cockpit.eqs.com/cgi-bin/fncls.ssp?fn=redirect&url=2830e6dab14a67e585171f7ce368609a&application_id=768227&site_id=vwd&application_name=news 
 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

January 22, 2019 00:30 ET (05:30 GMT)

© 2019 Dow Jones News
Die USA haben fertig! 5 Aktien für den China-Boom
Die Finanzwelt ist im Umbruch! Nach Jahren der Dominanz erschüttert Donald Trumps erratische Wirtschaftspolitik das Fundament des amerikanischen Kapitalismus. Handelskriege, Rekordzölle und politische Isolation haben eine Kapitalflucht historischen Ausmaßes ausgelöst.

Milliarden strömen aus den USA – und suchen neue, lukrative Ziele. Und genau hier kommt China ins Spiel. Trotz aller Spannungen wächst die chinesische Wirtschaft dynamisch weiter, Innovation und Digitalisierung treiben die Märkte an.

Im kostenlosen Spezialreport stellen wir Ihnen 5 Aktien aus China vor, die vom US-Niedergang profitieren und das Potenzial haben, den Markt regelrecht zu überflügeln. Wer jetzt klug investiert, sichert sich den Zugang zu den neuen Wachstums-Champions von morgen.

Holen Sie sich den neuesten Report! Verpassen Sie nicht, welche 5 Aktien die Konkurrenz aus den USA outperformen dürften, und laden Sie sich das Gratis-PDF jetzt kostenlos herunter.

Dieses exklusive Angebot gilt aber nur für kurze Zeit! Daher jetzt downloaden!
Werbehinweise: Die Billigung des Basisprospekts durch die BaFin ist nicht als ihre Befürwortung der angebotenen Wertpapiere zu verstehen. Wir empfehlen Interessenten und potenziellen Anlegern den Basisprospekt und die Endgültigen Bedingungen zu lesen, bevor sie eine Anlageentscheidung treffen, um sich möglichst umfassend zu informieren, insbesondere über die potenziellen Risiken und Chancen des Wertpapiers. Sie sind im Begriff, ein Produkt zu erwerben, das nicht einfach ist und schwer zu verstehen sein kann.