Anzeige
Mehr »
Login
Dienstag, 07.05.2024 Börsentäglich über 12.000 News von 686 internationalen Medien
+56,25% in 5 Tagen: Genialer Schachzug - diese Übernahme verändert alles
Anzeige

Indizes

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Aktien

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Xetra-Orderbuch

Fonds

Kurs

%

Devisen

Kurs

%

Rohstoffe

Kurs

%

Themen

Kurs

%

Erweiterte Suche
GlobeNewswire
375 Leser
Artikel bewerten:
(1)

Nasdaq Nordic: A fine imposed to SAV-Rahoitus Oyj for breaching First North Bond Market Rules

Helsinki, Mar 31, 2021 - The Disciplinary Committee of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd has
imposed a fine of EUR 10,000 to SAV-Rahoitus Oyj, a bond issuer, due to the
breaches of the Nasdaq First North Bond Market Rulebook ("the Rules") of Nasdaq
Helsinki ("the Exchange"). SAV-Rahoitus Oyj ("the Company") did not comply with
the Rules concerning bond issuers when announcing the notice to its 2020 Annual
General Meeting and the resolutions of the Annual General Meeting and its
half-yearly report in 2020. Furthermore, the Company breached the Rules on the
organizational requirements of an issuer. 

Events

In its Company description on April 2, 2020, connected to the listing of the
bond, the Company had announced that it will disclose the date of the general
meeting as soon as the date is known. In the same document the Company had
announced the expected date, August 14, 2020, for the disclosure date of the
Company's half-yearly report. On Friday, September 18, 2020, the Company had
contacted the Exchange regarding the disclosure of the half-yearly report since
it had been completed and since it had appeared that the Company did not
possess a valid agreement on the announcement distribution system. The Company
informed the Exchange that it will disclose the half-yearly report as soon as
possible, which took place on Monday, September 21, 2020. It also turned out
that the resolutions of the general meeting on June 16, 2020, had not been
disclosed after the meeting but only on September 21, 2020, after the Exchange
had paid attention to it. Furthermore, the notice to the general meeting was
not disclosed at all. 

Content of the Rules

According to the Rules, the Issuer shall disclose the notice to general
meetings and the resolutions adopted by the general meeting. 

According to the Rules, half-yearly reports shall be published as soon as
possible, however not later than within two months from the expiry of the
reporting period. Further, the Rules require that in case the disclosed
information changes, the issuer shall disclose the change with an announcement
as soon as possible. 

The Rules require that the issuer must possess the organization and staff
required in order to comply with the requirements regarding disclosure of
information to the market. 

Disclosure of notice to Annual General Meeting and its resolutions

According to the Disciplinary Committee, the company explained that they did
not have a valid agreement to distribute announcements due to a human error. 
They had erroneously made a nonrecurring agreement instead of a continuous one. 

The Disciplinary Committee states that in order to disclose releases the
issuers of bonds, as other listed companies, shall have an agreement on the
distribution of announcements with a service provider. This is to facilitate
that the announcements required by the regulations can be disclosed as soon as
possible and in such a manner that the information is available in a fast and
non-discriminatory way. The Company and, especially its board of directors
based on the rule 3.3 of the Rules, have a duty to look after that the Company
possesses necessary resources in accordance with the Rules to disclose notices
to the general meeting and the resolutions made. This obligation exists even
though the potential human mistake had taken place regarding the term of the
agreement on the announcement distribution system. Further, the mistake does
not explain why the operative management or the board of the Company had not
noticed before the general meeting that the notice to meeting or the
resolutions made thereafter had not been disclosed as required by the rules. 

The Disciplinary Committee states further that the disclosure of the notice to
the general meeting and the resolutions of the general meeting are an essential
part of the Company's disclosure obligation. Based on this, the non-disclosure
of those is substantial negligence. 

Disclosure of half-yearly report

According to the decision of the Disciplinary Committee, the Company has said
to immediately taken actions to acquire continuous announcement distribution
agreement with another service provider and to try to disclose the half-yearly
report immediately. According to the Company, it had not delayed the
announcement on purpose, as another announcement distribution system was not
available until Monday, September 21, 2020, immediately on the first working
day after the weekend. 

The Disciplinary Committee states that the half-yearly report was disclosed
after the timeline in the Rules and over one month later than what was
announced in the Company description. The changed timetable had neither been
announced separately. This kind of action is not appropriate in the securities
market and not in accordance with the Rules. According to the Disciplinary
Committee, this is the conclusion despite the disclosure date was originally
announced as an expected date. 

The Disciplinary Committee further states that the Rules do not allow that the
disclosure of the completed half-yearly report is postponed over the weekend.
It is the obligation of the Company and its board to arrange the operation in
such a manner that the Company has necessary resources for disclosure of
announcements as soon as possible as required by the Rules. 

Organizational requirements

The Disciplinary Committee states in the decision that it has not been
presented that the organization and staff of the Company would have been
arranged insufficiently as such. In connection to to listing the board had
accepted a disclosure policy which had been delivered to the operative
management, and a separate training had been arranged to the operative
management. 

What comes to supervising of the fulfillment of the disclosure obligation, the
Disciplinary Committee states that, in a company listed as an bond issuer,
there are duties of the operative management and the board that typically
relate to invitation to general meeting and preparation of the resolutions of
the general meeting and the half-yearly report. In connection to those
practical matters related to the disclosure obligation are needed to be dealt
with. There have been several occasions during the reviewed period where the
operative management and the board of the Company should have paid attention to
what the requirements for disclosing information of the rules of the
marketplace are. The Disciplinary Committee further states, based on the
general supervisory obligation and the Rule 3.3, that the sufficient monitoring
and supervisory actions belong to the duties of the board of a listed bond
issuer. 

According to the Disciplinary Committee, the Company has neglected the
obligations by not disclosing the notice to the general meeting and by
disclosing late, the general meeting's resolutions and the half-yearly report.
After the listing, the Company did not have a valid agreement on the
announcement distribution system. In addition, the board of the Company said
that it had not noticed or otherwise become aware of the aforementioned
negligence or deficiencies before the disciplinary process that was started by
the Exchange. 

The Disciplinary Committee says in its decision that even though the
organization of the Company is arranged as such in accordance with the Rules,
the board of the Company has failed in monitoring and supervising the
disclosure of announcements. The responsibility of the board in this respect
cannot be excluded based on the circumstance that the operative management had
not informed the board about the matter and based on the circumstance that the
board has had reason to trust on the operation of the operative management as
such. Instead, the Disciplinary Committee takes in its assessment into account
that the board has immediately after being informed about the aforementioned
negligence and deficiencies taken actions to correct the situation. According
to the Disciplinary Committee and based on the information given by the
Company, there is no reason to suspect that the operation of the Company would
not have been organized after the corrective actions as required by the Rules. 

The conclusion of the Disciplinary Committee on this is that the operation of
Company regarding the supervision of the disclosure obligation has not been
organized in accordance with the Rules, but in this respect, it is corrected. 

Assessment of sanctions

The decision of the Disciplinary Committee states that several consecutive but
separate breaches of disclosure obligation, partly essential, show that the
Company has neglected in a sufficient manner to take into account the market
rules that it has committed as an issuer of a bond. The Disciplinary Committee
states that disclosing information in timely manner is one of the main
obligations of the bond issuer. This applies to all disclosures of information
by the bond issuer, also to the regular annual reporting. The negligence of
disclosing information and timely disclosure are likely to substantially affect
the trustworthiness of the operation of the securities markets and the
Exchange. Disregarding the proper disclosure of information may weaken the
position of the investors both on the primary and secondary markets. It is
essential for the objectives of the regulations that the organization and the
responsible governing bodies of the Company deal sufficiently seriously with
the fulfillment and supervision of disclosure obligation. 

On the other hand, when assessing the sanctions, the Disciplinary Committee has
taken into account the corrective actions by the Company related to disclosing
of information and deficiencies in organizing it. These remedial actions made
afterwards cannot however be given a crucial relevance. Neither the
circumstance, raised by the Company, that there has not been trading with the
bond on the market place, cannot have substantial relevance when the Company is
still committed to the rules of the market and, with the listing, received the
public trustworthiness in the primary bond market. 

Based on the aforementioned, and taking into account the partial materiality of
the negligence, the Disciplinary Committee states in its decision that under
the circumstances the Company shall be imposed a fine of EUR 10,000. 

Resolution statement

SAV-Rahoitus Oyj has when announcing the notice to the Annual General Meeting
2020 and the resolutions of the general meeting as well as the half-yearly
report 2020 breached the rules 4.2.1, 4.2.2 and 4.4.c of the Nasdaq First North
Bond Market Rulebook. In addition, SAV-Rahoitus Oyj has breached the rule 2.2.3
on the organizational requirements of the issuer. 

In accordance with the Rules, the Disciplinary Committee imposed SAV-Rahoitus
Oyj a fine of EUR 10,000. 

Surveillance at Nasdaq Helsinki and the Disciplinary Committee

The surveillance unit of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd investigates all suspected
breaches of regulations. Minor breaches will result in non-public reprimand to
the company, whereas more serious cases are referred to the Disciplinary
Committee. The members of the Disciplinary Committee are legal and financial
experts independent of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. The members of the Committee are
Mr. Ari Kantor, Justice, Supreme Court of Finland, Mrs. Helena Kontkanen, L. of
Laws, Bankruptcy Ombudsman of Finland, Mr. Kari Hietanen, Executive Vice
President, Mr. Markku Savikko, M. of Laws, and Mr. Sami Torstila, D. Sc, M. of
Laws, Associate Professor. According to the First North Bond Market Rulebook,
sanctions may be a reprimand, a fine or in an utmost case a delisting. For more
information about the Disciplinary Committee please visit
https://www.nasdaq.com/solutions/helsinki-disciplinary-processes 

Nasdaq Nordic Foundation

The Disciplinary Committees of Nasdaq Helsinki, Nasdaq Copenhagen and Nasdaq
Stockholm may, in case of a breach by a member or a listed company, resolve to
fine the member or the listed company. The paid fine is transferred to the
Nasdaq Nordic Foundation for the promotion of the foundation's objective, which
is to promote scientific research of the financial markets in Finland, Denmark
and Sweden, providing impetus for increased competence and competitiveness for
these financial markets. Three of the directors of the Foundation shall have
extensive academic experience within the field of financial markets. 

About Nasdaq

Nasdaq (Nasdaq: NDAQ) is a global technology company serving the capital
markets and other industries. Our diverse offering of data, analytics, software
and services enables clients to optimize and execute their business vision with
confidence. To learn more about the company, technology solutions and career
opportunities, visit us on LinkedIn, on Twitter @Nasdaq, or at www.nasdaq.com. 

Nasdaq Copenhagen, Nasdaq Helsinki, Nasdaq Iceland, Nasdaq Riga, Nasdaq
Stockholm, Nasdaq Tallinn, Nasdaq Vilnius, Nasdaq Clearing and Nasdaq Broker
Services are respectively brand names for the regulated markets of Nasdaq
Copenhagen A/S, Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd., Nasdaq Iceland hf., Nasdaq Riga, AS,
Nasdaq Stockholm AB, Nasdaq Tallinn AS, AB Nasdaq Vilnius, Nasdaq Clearing AB
and Nasdaq Broker Services AB. Nasdaq Nordic represents the common offering by
Nasdaq Copenhagen, Nasdaq Helsinki, Nasdaq Iceland and Nasdaq Stockholm. Nasdaq
Baltic represents the common offering by Nasdaq Tallinn, Nasdaq Riga and Nasdaq
Vilnius. 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The matters described herein contain forward-looking statements that are made
under the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements about
Nasdaq and its products and offerings. We caution that these statements are not
guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from
those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or other factors beyond
Nasdaq's control. These factors include, but are not limited to factors
detailed in Nasdaq's annual report on Form 10-K, and periodic reports filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to
release any revisions to any forward-looking statements. 

Nasdaq Media Contact:
Maarit Bystedt
tel. +358 (0)9 6166 724
maarit.bystedt@nasdaq.com
Kupfer - Jetzt! So gelingt der Einstieg in den Rohstoff-Trend!
In diesem kostenfreien Report schaut sich Carsten Stork den Kupfer-Trend im Detail an und gibt konkrete Produkte zum Einstieg an die Hand.
Hier klicken
© 2021 GlobeNewswire
Werbehinweise: Die Billigung des Basisprospekts durch die BaFin ist nicht als ihre Befürwortung der angebotenen Wertpapiere zu verstehen. Wir empfehlen Interessenten und potenziellen Anlegern den Basisprospekt und die Endgültigen Bedingungen zu lesen, bevor sie eine Anlageentscheidung treffen, um sich möglichst umfassend zu informieren, insbesondere über die potenziellen Risiken und Chancen des Wertpapiers. Sie sind im Begriff, ein Produkt zu erwerben, das nicht einfach ist und schwer zu verstehen sein kann.